No. 2009-00330. March 16, 2010. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered December 11, 2008, as granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Meyer, Suozzi, English Klein, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Robert N. Zausmer, Donnalynn Darling, and Jen A. Leahy of counsel), for appellant. Richard T. Lau, Jericho, N.Y. (Nancy
November 13, 1980 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, ROBERT J. McDOWELL, J. John D. Doyle, County Attorney (Christine E. Burke of counsel), for appellants. Faraci, Guadagnino, Lange Johns (Joseph A. Regan of counsel), for respondent. SCHNEPP, J. Plaintiff is the owner of improved real property situate in the Town of Pittsford, Monroe County, to the rear of which is located a body of water known as Knowlton Creek. The creek flows in a westerly direction from the east side of East Avenue
CA 02-01994 June 13, 2003. Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Dillon, J.), entered December 6, 2001, upon a jury verdict rendered in favor of defendant Michael Deakin. LAW OFFICES OF EUGENE C. TENNEY, BUFFALO (ERIC M. SHELTON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. HAGELIN BISCHOF, LLC, BUFFALO (DENNIS J. BISCHOF OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed
December 30, 1992 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orleans County, Whelan, J. Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ. Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: The court erred by granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. On a motion for summary judgment, the proponent of the motion must set forth evidentiary proof, in admissible form, eliminating any material issue of fact from the suit (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; Merkley
No. 2007-04847. February 26, 2008. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated March 7, 2007, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Before: Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Covello and Eng, JJ. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is granted, and the matter is remitted to the
2005-06426. April 18, 2006. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated May 10, 2005, which granted the motion of the defendant Raul Vivas Munoz for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Simon Gilman, LLP, Forest Hills, N.Y. (Keith A. Gilman and Barry Simon of counsel), for appellant. Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Holly E. Peck of
(a) All lamps required by this subpart shall be capable of being operated at all times. This paragraph shall not be construed to require that any auxiliary or additional lamp be capable of operating at all times. (b) Lamps and reflective devices/material required by this subpart must not be obscured by the tailboard, or by any part of the load, or its covering by dirt, or other added vehicle or work equipment, or otherwise. Exception: The conspicuity treatments on the front end protection devices