§Why CasetextPricing

Susan M. Coffed, as Administrator of the Estate of James B. Coffed, Deceased, Appellant,v.John N. McCarthy et al., Respondents.

Brief

18 Cited authorities

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp

    68 N.Y.2d 320 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 21,192 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Finding summary judgment appropriate by relying on a treating doctor's unrebutted deposition testimony

  2. Moreback v. Mesquita

    17 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 53 times

    2004-08607. April 11, 2005. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), dated September 13, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to reargue the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which had been granted by an order dated May 18, 2004, and, upon reargument, vacated the prior order and denied the motion. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting

  3. Szczotka v. Adler

    291 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 55 times
    In Conrad v. Adler, 13 N.D. 199, 100 N.W. 722, it was held that a deed to property that was possessed adversely to the grantor was void.

  4. Cenovski v. Lee

    266 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 48 times

    Submitted October 20, 1999 November 30, 1999 In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated December 3, 1998, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Benedict Morelli Associates (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Benedict P. Morelli and Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellants. Vincent P. Crisci, New York, N.Y. (Michael V. Campanile

  5. Morgan v. Hachmann

    9 A.D.3d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 38 times

    2004-01836. July 12, 2004. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated February 11, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted. Before: Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Spolzino, JJ., concur. The plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment

  6. Lupowitz v. Fogarty

    295 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 36 times

    2001-06507 Submitted May 21, 2002. June 25, 2002. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated June 28, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Krantz Phillips, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Heath T. Buzin of counsel), for appellant. James P. Nunemaker, Jr., Uniondale, N.Y. (Keith E. Ford of counsel), for respondent. Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI

  7. Rieman v. Smith

    302 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 34 times

    2002-05117 Argued January 21, 2003. February 18, 2003. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated May 14, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Law Office of Robert J. Cava, P.C., West Babylon, N.Y., for appellant. Lloyd J. Nadel, Mineola, N.Y., for respondents. Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ

  8. Meliarenne v. Prisco

    9 A.D.3d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 29 times

    2003-06403. July 6, 2004. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated June 3, 2003, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Dinesh Kripaliani which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Before: Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Townes and Fisher, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed

  9. Barile v. Carroll

    280 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that defendant's admitted failure to see the decedent's vehicle until the moment of impact did not defeat motion for summary judgment, due to lack of evidence that such failure was due to any negligence

  10. Kelsey v. Degan

    266 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 28 times

    November 12, 1999 Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Summary Judgment. PRESENT: DENMAN, P. J., PINE, WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., AND CALLAHAN, JJ. Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: On September 26, 1995, Patricia A. Kelsey (plaintiff) sustained injuries when her vehicle collided with a vehicle driven by defendant. Plaintiff was proceeding north on Transit Road. Plaintiff testified at her deposition that she was driving between