§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.On Sight Mobile Opticians, Respondent.

Brief

13 Cited authorities

  1. Central Hudson Gas Elec. v. Public Serv. Comm'n

    447 U.S. 557 (1980)   Cited 2,052 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on commercial speech must directly advance a substantial governmental interest

  2. Va. Pharmacy Bd. v. Va. Consumer Council

    425 U.S. 748 (1976)   Cited 1,730 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding society and consumers both have a strong interest "in the free flow of commercial information"

  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego

    453 U.S. 490 (1981)   Cited 1,031 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that traffic safety is a "substantial governmental goal"

  4. People v. Casey

    95 N.Y.2d 354 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 1,347 times
    Finding nonhearsay allegations including the complainant's supporting deposition, which stated that the order had been issued, was in effect, and that she had personally observed the defendant engage in conduct that violated the order could help to cure an alleged defect in the instrument premised on the failure to provide the underlying court order

  5. People v. Kalin

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2446 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 687 times
    In Kalin, 12 N.Y.3d 225, 878 N.Y.S.2d 653, 906 N.E.2d 381, the Court of Appeals examined an information which had charged the defendant with, among other things, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree for the possession of nine plastic bags of heroin.

  6. People v. Alejandro

    70 N.Y.2d 133 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 1,219 times
    Reviewing the legislature's intent to create a "demanding standard" for the sufficiency of informations

  7. People v. Dumas

    68 N.Y.2d 729 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 717 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting lack of allegation that police officer was an expert in identifying marijuana or that defendant represented it as such, to support charge that defendant sold marijuana

  8. People v. Jones

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9070 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 228 times
    Dismissing an information alleging disorderly conduct because there was no indication that the defendant "when he stood in the middle of the sidewalk . . . had the intent to or recklessly created a risk of causing 'public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm'"

  9. National Advertising Co. v. Town of Babylon

    900 F.2d 551 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 70 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sign ordinance's exceptions to sign ban for temporary political signs and signs identifying parades, festivals, and other similar occasions "impermissibly discriminate between types of noncommercial speech based on content"

  10. U.S. v. Schneiderman

    968 F.2d 1564 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that the statute "provides sufficient guidance to prohibit its arbitrary or discriminatory application"