§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Dwight R. DeLee, Respondent.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Powell

    469 U.S. 57 (1984)   Cited 2,043 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant can be convicted of telephone facilitation despite an acquittal on the predicate felony

  2. Dunn v. United States

    284 U.S. 390 (1932)   Cited 1,492 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a jury's verdicts can stand even if they are inconsistent, and noting that "acquittal on one count may be explained as an exercise of lenity by the jury that is not necessarily grounded in its view of the evidence"

  3. People v. Tucker

    55 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 598 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Tucker, we observed that, where a repugnant verdict was the result, not of irrationality, but mercy, courts "should not... undermine the jury's role and participation by setting aside the verdict" (55 NY2d at 7).

  4. People v. Muhammad

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7302 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 183 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that acquittals on weapon possession counts "did not inherently negate" the element of "intent to cause serious physical injury" of first-degree assault by means of a weapon

  5. People v. Kramer

    118 A.D.3d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 11 times

    2014-06-5 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sean KRAMER, Appellant. Brennan & White, LLP, Queensbury (Joseph R. Brennan of counsel), for appellant. J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Devin J. Anderson of counsel), for respondent. EGAN JR. Brennan & White, LLP, Queensbury (Joseph R. Brennan of counsel), for appellant. J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Devin J. Anderson of counsel), for respondent. Before: STEIN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE and EGAN JR.,

  6. People v. Delee

    108 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 11 times
    Modifying judgment because, “based on our review of the elements of the offenses as charged to the jury, we conclude that the verdict is inconsistent, i.e., ‘legally impossible,’ insofar as it finds defendant guilty of manslaughter in the first degree as a hate crime but not guilty of manslaughter in the first degree”

  7. People v. Lamont

    113 A.D.3d 1069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 5 times

    2014-01-3 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jafari LAMONT, Defendant–Appellant. Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Janet C. Somes of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Jafari Lamont, Defendant–Appellant Pro Se. Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Janet C. Somes of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Jafari Lamont, Defendant–Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Erin Tubbs of Counsel), for Respondent. PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO

  8. People v. Isakov

    120 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 2 times

    2014-08-13 The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mikhail ISAKOV, also known as Mikhail Izaikov, also known as Mikhail Izraikov, appellant. The People, etc., respondent, v. Arthur Ibragimov, appellant. The People, etc., respondent, v. David Ibragimov, also known as David Ibragmchayev, appellant. The People, etc., respondent, v. MB Globus, LLC, appellant. The People, etc., respondent, v. AN International, LLC, appellant. The People, etc., respondent, v. MA Concord, LLC, appellant. The People, etc., respondent

  9. People v. McFadden

    90 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 2 times

    2011-12-1 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brian McFADDEN, Defendant–Appellant. Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Lauren Stephens–Davidowitz of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for respondent. TOM Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Lauren Stephens–Davidowitz of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Thomas R. Villecco

  10. People v. Spralling

    91 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 1 times

    2012-01-19 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David SPRALLING, Defendant–Appellant. Mischel & Horn, P.C., New York (Richard E. Mischel of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Megan R. Roberts of counsel), for respondent. GONZALEZ Mischel & Horn, P.C., New York (Richard E. Mischel of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Megan R. Roberts of counsel), for respondent. GONZALEZ, P.J., ANDRIAS, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, ABDUS–SALAAM