6 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Bing

    76 N.Y.2d 331 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 310 times
    In Bing, the New York Court of Appeals held that a criminal defendant, who had been represented by counsel on prior pending unrelated charges, was not deprived of the right to counsel under the State Constitution where, in the absence of counsel, the defendant waived his or her Miranda rights and made statements in response to police questioning on matters unrelated to the prior pending charge.
  2. People v. Reome

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5283 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 157 times
    Rejecting Hudson and holding that "harmonizing evidence may provide a substantial basis for crediting accomplice testimony"
  3. People v. Bartolomeo

    53 N.Y.2d 225 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 282 times
    Holding that under the state constitution it is a violation of a defendant's rights to interrogate him with knowledge that he is represented by counsel, albeit on a separate unrelated charge
  4. Burnet v. Coronado Oil Gas Co.

    285 U.S. 393 (1932)   Cited 358 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that stare decisis is "usually the wise policy" because consistency and reliance interests are significant, but explaining that the Supreme Court has never hesitated to overrule prior decisions where "correction . . . is practically impossible" (citations and footnotes omitted)
  5. People v. Hudson

    51 N.Y.2d 233 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 127 times
    In People v Hudson (51 N.Y.2d 233, 238-239), the Court of Appeals, reviewing the law of accomplice corroboration, observed: "The mandate of the statute is that there shall be evidence, in addition to that furnished by the accomplice, `tending to connect the defendant with the commission' of the crime.
  6. Reed Foundation, Inc. v. Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park, LLC

    108 A.D.3d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 11 times
    Holding donor has standing to enforce its contractual agreement related to donation