§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Twanek Cummings, Appellant.

Brief

45 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 17,403 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"

  2. Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp.

    486 U.S. 800 (1988)   Cited 3,120 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the appeal belonged before the regional circuit because the claims did not arise under patent law

  3. Luce v. United States

    469 U.S. 38 (1984)   Cited 3,619 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant failed to preserve an issue for appeal where the trial court ruled that he could be impeached with a prior conviction under Fed. R. Evid. 609 and he thereafter declined to testify

  4. Arizona v. California

    460 U.S. 605 (1983)   Cited 2,204 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that res judicata barred re-opening the quantification of tribes' Winters rights

  5. Ohler v. United States

    529 U.S. 753 (2000)   Cited 951 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "appellate review of an in limine ruling" that evidence is admissible is unavailable to the party that introduced the evidence

  6. People v. Crimmins

    36 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 5,685 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an error is prejudicial "if an appellate court concludes that there is a significant probability, rather than only a rational possibility, in the particular case that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had it not been for the error or errors which occurred"

  7. U.S. v. Newton

    369 F.3d 659 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 607 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding handcuffing while police searched for firearm thought to be on premises less intimidating and dangerous than holding suspect at gunpoint

  8. People v. Malizia

    62 N.Y.2d 755 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 857 times
    In People v. Malizia, 62 NY2d 755 [1984], the Court of Appeals held that the evidentiary rulings of a first trial did not automatically apply to a second trial (see People v. Nieves, 67 NY 125 [1986]).

  9. People c. v. Evans

    94 N.Y.2d 499 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 491 times
    Finding law of the case addresses judicial determinations made in course of single litigation

  10. People v. Carroll

    95 N.Y.2d 375 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 279 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding admission of expert testimony about child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome “for the purpose of instructing the jury about possible reasons why a child might not immediately report incidents of sexual abuse” and emphasizing that expert “never opined that defendant committed the crimes, that defendant's stepdaughter was sexually abused, or even that her specific actions and behavior were consistent with such abuse ”