§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Senator Tony Avella, et al., Respondents,v.City of New York, et al., Respondents, Queens Development Group, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Brief

14 Cited authorities

  1. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 77 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"

  2. Avella v. City of N.Y.

    131 A.D.3d 77 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 8 times

    100161/14, 15026 07-02-2015 In re Senator Tony AVELLA, et al., Petitioners/Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents/Defendants–Respondents. John R. Low–Beer, Brooklyn, and Law Office of Lorna B. Goodman, New York (Lorna B. Goodman of counsel), for appellants. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Michael J. Pastor and Richard Dearing of counsel), for municipal respondents. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York (Jonathan L. Frank and Judith S. Kaye

  3. Miller v. City of New York

    15 N.Y.2d 34 (N.Y. 1964)   Cited 73 times
    Finding a lease rather than a mere “revokable-at-pleasure license”

  4. Matter of Ackerman v. Steisel

    104 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 29 times

    October 15, 1984 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.). Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, petition granted, and the respondents are directed to remove the subject items from Cunningham Park within 90 days of service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Respondents are the Commissioners of the Departments of Sanitation, Parks and Transportation (Highways) of the City of New York. With the acquiescence of the Commissioner of Parks

  5. Matter of Ackerman v. Steisel

    489 N.E.2d 251 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 22 times

    Argued October 14, 1985 Decided November 14, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Albert H. Buschmann, J. Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Fay Leoussis and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellants. Nicholas G. Garaufis and Alan M. Block for respondents. Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 104 A.D.2d 940; see also, White v Adler, 289 N.Y. 34, 44). Concur: Chief

  6. Meriwether v. Garrett

    102 U.S. 472 (1880)   Cited 203 times
    Recognizing principle that public property of a municipality was not subject to execution

  7. Lake George Steamboat Co. v. Blais

    30 N.Y.2d 48 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Nullifying lease for public land

  8. Aldrich v. City of New York

    208 Misc. 930 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1955)   Cited 36 times
    In Aldrich (supra), members of the Board of Directors of the Park Association of New York City, Inc., a nonprofit corporation, which was dedicated to the preservation of City parks and playgrounds, commenced an action to enjoin the Board of Estimate from selling the Neponsit Beach Hospital property to private developers.

  9. Williams v. Gallatin

    229 N.Y. 248 (N.Y. 1920)   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a safety museum was foreign to park purposes

  10. Matter of Central Parkway

    140 Misc. 727 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1931)   Cited 32 times
    In Matter of Central Parkway, 140 Misc. 727 (Sup.Ct., Schenectady County 1931), the court stated that the occupation of parkland for "art museums, galleries of painting and sculpture, free public libraries and other agencies contributing to the aesthetic enjoyment of eye and ear is not a perversion of the lands from park purposes."

  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation