17 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Argyris

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8220 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 53 times
    In People v. Argyris, 24 N.Y.3d 1138, 3 N.Y.S.3d 711, 27 N.E.3d 425 [2014], a case involving vehicular stops, a divided Court of Appeals debated the nature of corroboration required for an anonymous tip.
  2. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 67 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"
  3. Union Square Park Cmty. Coal., Inc. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1207 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 25 times

    No. 17 02-20-2014 Union Square Park Community Coalition, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, et al., Respondents. Sanford I. Weisburst, for appellants. Deborah A. Brenner, for respondents. Liz Krueger et al.; Union Square Partnership et al.; New Yorkers for Parks; Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. et al., amici curiae. GRAFFEO Sanford I. Weisburst, for appellants. Deborah A. Brenner, for respondents. Liz Krueger et al.; Union Square Partnership et al.; New Yorkers

  4. Powell v. City of New York

    85 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4845. June 7, 2011. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered January 27, 2010, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment, denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, and declared that neither Asphalt Green nor Bobby Wagner Walk is subject to the public trust doctrine, and therefore, the City of New York is not required to obtain legislative approval before commencing demolition, construction or operation of an access

  5. In re Angiolillo v. Town of Greenburgh

    290 A.D.2d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 2000-07054 2000-09948 Argued February 8, 2001. December 3, 2001. APPEAL by WBRC Corporation and Baker Roofing, in a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain building permits are null and void and that the subject property is dedicated for public use as a park, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court (Peter M. Leavitt, J.), entered July 11, 2000, in Westchester County, as declared that the building

  6. Riverview Partners, LP v. City of Peekskill

    273 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 15 times

    Submitted April 17, 2000. July 26, 2000. In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain property is not a public park, the defendant appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated February 3, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment, granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, and declared that the subject property was not a public park. Florence Smith, Peekskill, N.Y. (Russell A. Smith of counsel),

  7. Matter of Lazore v. Board of Trustees

    191 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 15 times

    March 4, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County (Duskas, J.). Harvey, J. On July 21, 1950, the Village of Massena in St. Lawrence County acquired a 9.2-acre parcel of land bordering the Grasse River. The purpose of the purchase was, inter alia, to "provide a site for the erection of a Village Garage; to provide a site for the storage of Village-owned equipment * * * [and] to provide a site for recreational purposes upon that portion not needed for other purposes". On May 7, 1991

  8. Croton-On-Hudson v. Cty of Westchester

    38 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)   Cited 13 times

    March 31, 1972 In an action for an injunction, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 22, 1972, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. In our opinion, the record establishes that the approximately 20 acres of land which the defendant county proposes to excavate and use as a solid waste disposal site were acquired for public park purposes by a special borrowing and have been used as such

  9. Williams v. Gallatin

    229 N.Y. 248 (N.Y. 1920)   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a safety museum was foreign to park purposes
  10. People v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corp.

    7 N.E.2d 833 (N.Y. 1937)   Cited 28 times
    Discussing dedications of property to public use
  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation