§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Deborah Glick, et al., Appellants,v.Rose Harvey,, et al., Respondents, New York University, Third-Party Respondent.

Brief

57 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

    67 N.Y.2d 400 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 656 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that failure to raise challenges to FEIS under state environmental law during proceedings could not be overlooked when determining whether failure to discuss issue in FEIS was reasonable

  2. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 v. City of New York Department of Parks & Recreation

    311 F.3d 534 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that Lincoln Center Plaza had not been dedicated as a public park

  3. Parkview Assocs v. City of New York

    71 N.Y.2d 274 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 290 times
    Holding that "`[e]stoppel is not available against a local government unit for the purpose of ratifying an administrative error,'" and such an administrative error does not confer rights contrary to the zoning laws

  4. People v. Harris

    57 N.Y.2d 335 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 306 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that trial court properly admitted witness's testimony on rebuttal to refute defendant's direct testimony

  5. Chinese Staff & Workers Ass'n v. City of New York

    68 N.Y.2d 359 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 236 times
    In Chinese Staff, the municipality had created a special urban zoning district with seven specific building sites to encourage new residential development while preserving the well-defined community's unique ethnic and architectural characteristics.

  6. In re N.Y.C. Coalition to End Lead Poisoning v. Vallone

    100 N.Y.2d 337 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 109 times
    Invalidating Local Law 38 due to City Council's failure to include lead dust in the “Negative Declaration” of environmental effects mandated by SEQRA

  7. Capruso v. Vill. of Kings Point

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4228 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 70 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Capruso, members of the public challenged a village's proposal to deforest and construct a warehouse on a corner of parkland.

  8. E.F.S. Ventures v. Foster

    71 N.Y.2d 359 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 142 times
    In Matter of E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v Foster (71 N.Y.2d 359), we recognized that the exercise of site plan approval powers requires "[a] large measure of discretion" (id., at 370).

  9. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 77 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"

  10. Union Square Park Cmty. Coal., Inc. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1207 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 42 times
    Rejecting public trust claim

  11. Section 617.7 - Determining significance

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.7   Cited 237 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (a) The lead agency must determine the significance of any Type I or Unlisted action in writing in accordance with this section. (1) To require an EIS for a proposed action, the lead agency must determine that the action may include the potential for at least one significant adverse environmental impact. (2) To determine that an EIS will not be required for an action, the lead agency must determine either that there will be no adverse environmental impacts or that the identified adverse environmental

  12. Section 617.3 - General rules

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.3   Cited 166 times

    (a) No agency involved in an action may undertake, fund or approve the action until it has complied with the provisions of SEQR. A project sponsor may not commence any physical alteration related to an action until the provisions of SEQR have been complied with. The only exception to this is provided under section 617.5(c) (24), (27), and (34) of this Part. An involved agency may not issue its findings and decision on an action if it knows any other involved agency has determined that the action

  13. Section 617.9 - Preparation and content of environmental impact statements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.9   Cited 142 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a) Environmental impact statement procedures. (1) The project sponsor or the lead agency, at the project sponsor's option, will prepare the draft EIS. If the project sponsor does not exercise the option to prepare the draft EIS, the lead agency will prepare it, cause it to be prepared or terminate its review of the action. A fee may be charged by the lead agency for preparation or review of an EIS pursuant to section 617.13 of this Part. (2) The lead agency will use the final written scope and the

  14. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation