§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Deborah Glick, et al., Appellants,v.Rose Harvey,, et al., Respondents, New York University, Third-Party Respondent.

Brief

51 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Callahan

    80 N.Y.2d 273 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 1,145 times
    Holding that "a bargained-for waiver of the right to appeal is ineffective to the extent it impairs the defendant's ability to obtain appellate review" of unwaivable claims

  2. Dalton v. Educ. Testing Serv

    87 N.Y.2d 384 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 880 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant testing service breached the implied covenant by ignoring evidence it invited the plaintiff to submit

  3. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 v. City of New York Department of Parks & Recreation

    311 F.3d 534 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that Lincoln Center Plaza had not been dedicated as a public park

  4. Riverkeeper v. Planning Bd.

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9064 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 164 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 149. Argued October 18, 2007. Decided November 19, 2007. APPEAL, in the first three above-entitled proceedings, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered August 8, 2006. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, three judgments (one as to each proceeding) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Francis A. Nicolai, J.; op 2003 NY Slip Op 50776[U] [Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town

  5. Chinese Staff & Workers Ass'n v. City of New York

    68 N.Y.2d 359 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 236 times
    In Chinese Staff, the municipality had created a special urban zoning district with seven specific building sites to encourage new residential development while preserving the well-defined community's unique ethnic and architectural characteristics.

  6. In re N.Y.C. Coalition to End Lead Poisoning v. Vallone

    100 N.Y.2d 337 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 109 times
    Invalidating Local Law 38 due to City Council's failure to include lead dust in the “Negative Declaration” of environmental effects mandated by SEQRA

  7. Westbury v. Dept of Transp

    75 N.Y.2d 62 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 146 times

    Argued November 15, 1989 Decided December 19, 1989 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Alfred S. Robbins, J. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Andrea Green, O. Peter Sherwood and Lawrence S. Kahn of counsel), for appellants. Thomas R. Derosa, Stephen L. Gordon, Sy Gruza and Craig Kravit for respondent. SIMONS, J. Petitioner Village of Westbury instituted this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking relief from respondents' alleged violation of the

  8. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 77 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"

  9. Union Square Park Cmty. Coal., Inc. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1207 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 42 times
    Rejecting public trust claim

  10. Comm. v. Planning. Commn

    259 A.D.2d 26 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that "noise and traffic" problems and "contaminants to be released into the air" are the "aesthetic or quality of life type of injuries have consistently been recognized by courts as a basis for standing" under SEQRA

  11. Section 617.9 - Preparation and content of environmental impact statements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.9   Cited 142 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a) Environmental impact statement procedures. (1) The project sponsor or the lead agency, at the project sponsor's option, will prepare the draft EIS. If the project sponsor does not exercise the option to prepare the draft EIS, the lead agency will prepare it, cause it to be prepared or terminate its review of the action. A fee may be charged by the lead agency for preparation or review of an EIS pursuant to section 617.13 of this Part. (2) The lead agency will use the final written scope and the

  12. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation