26 Cited authorities

  1. Hallock v. State of New York

    64 N.Y.2d 224 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 1,339 times
    Holding that "[e]ssential to the creation of apparent authority are words or conduct of the principal, communicated to a third party, that give rise to the appearance and belief that the agent possesses authority to enter into a transaction...[t]he agent cannot by his own acts imbue himself with apparent authority."
  2. Kirschner v. KPMG LLP

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7415 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 257 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Noting the "fundamental principle that ... the acts of agents, ... while acting within the scope of their authority are presumptively imputed to their principals"
  3. DDJ Management, LLC v. Rhone Group LLC

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5603 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Suggesting that a Plaintiff "will often be justified" in accepting a written representation that certain facts are true rather than making its own inquiry
  4. Ford v. Unity Hosp

    32 N.Y.2d 464 (N.Y. 1973)   Cited 222 times
    Finding no jurisdiction where the defendant “purposefully avoided any contacts with New York,” and where defendant in fact rejected contacts emanating from within New York
  5. Leonard v. Gateway II, LLC

    68 A.D.3d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 60 times

    No. 1592. December 1, 2009. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered December 17, 2008, which granted the motion by the Gaetano defendants, Gateway Condominium and Manhattan Property Managers Realty to dismiss the complaint against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Tapalaga Associates, P.C., New York (Gabriel Tapalaga of counsel), for appellant. Stein Farkas Schwartz LLP, New York (Esther E. Schwartz of counsel), for respondents. Before: Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz

  6. Parlato v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

    299 A.D.2d 108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 58 times
    Holding recovery on fraud limited to transaction's six-year limitations period
  7. Vanship Holdings v. Energy Infrastructure

    65 A.D.3d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 37 times

    August 4, 2009. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered December 2, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, enjoined respondents from distributing $2.6 million of the funds in an account held by Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company as trustee for Energy Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (EIAC), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the injunction vacated. Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Catterson and DeGrasse

  8. Weldon v. Rivera

    301 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that arguments which plaintiff failed to address were deemed conceded
  9. Lunal Realty Llc v. Disanto Realty Llc

    88 A.D.3d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 22 times

    2011-10-4 LUNAL REALTY, LLC, et al., appellants,v.DiSANTO REALTY, LLC, et al., respondents. Cuddy & Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Andrew P. Schriever and Brian P. Galligan of counsel), for appellants.Schillinger & Finsterwald, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Peter Schillinger and Lori Finsterwald of counsel), for respondents. WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ. Cuddy & Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Andrew P. Schriever and Brian P. Galligan of counsel)

  10. Citibank v. Chicago Tit. Ins. Co.

    214 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)   Cited 40 times

    September 28, 1995 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Walter M. Schackman, J. Jerome M. Lasky of counsel (David Rabinowitz and Edward R. Finkelstein on the brief; Moses Singer, attorneys), for appellant. Lawrence J. Slattery, and Schwall Becker, for respondent. SULLIVAN, J.P. This appeal presents the issue of whether a mortgagee, here Citibank, the insured under a mortgage title insurance policy, may, absent proof that its alleged loss was occasioned by the subordination of the insured

  11. Section 600.10 - Format and content of records, appendices and briefs

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.10   Cited 9 times

    (a) Form and size. (1) Generally; paper and page size. Records, appendices and briefs shall be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black on white copy and shall be on a good grade of white, opaque, unglazed recycled paper that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (e) of this section. Paper shall measure vertically 11 inches on the bound edge and horizontally 81/2 inches. The clerk may refuse to accept for filing a paper which is not legible or otherwise does not comply