20 Cited authorities

  1. Morris v. Dept. of Taxation

    82 N.Y.2d 135 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 1,274 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "piercing the corporate veil requires a showing that: the owners exercised complete domination of the corporation in respect to the transaction attacked; and that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff which resulted in plaintiff's injury."
  2. TNS Holdings, Inc. v. MKI Sec. Corp.

    92 N.Y.2d 335 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 435 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "interrelatedness, standing alone, is not enough to subject a nonsignatory to arbitration"
  3. Foley v. D'Agostino

    21 A.D.2d 60 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)   Cited 689 times
    Stating that “[t]hey may not assume and engage in the promotion of personal interests which are incompatible with the superior interests of their corporation.”
  4. Tap Holdings, LLC v. Orix Finance Corp.

    109 A.D.3d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 108 times
    Distinguishing Devash and focusing on allegations that actions "had no legitimate business interest"
  5. Quadrant Structured Prods. Co. v. Vertin

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4114 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 103 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no-action clause applied to securityholder's contract claims where clause precluded suits “upon or under or with respect to this Indenture”
  6. Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v. Atl. Yards B2 Owner, LLC

    146 A.D.3d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 47 times

    10-20-2016 SKANSKA USA BUILDING INC., Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent, v. ATLANTIC YARDS B2 OWNER, LLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents–Appellants, ABC Companies, LLC, et al., Defendants. Associated General Contractors of NYS, LLC, Amicus Curiae. Peckar & Abramson, P.C., New York (Bruce D. Meller and Peter E. Moran of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York (Harold P. Weinberger, Nathan M. Hammeerman and Kaavya Viswanathan of counsel), and Troutman Sanders

  7. Holme v. Global Minerals and Metals Corp.

    63 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 29 times
    In Holme v Global Minerals and Metals Corp. (63 AD3d 417, 418 [1st Dept 2009]), a recent case involving similar allegations, the plaintiff claimed that the shareholders of the judgment debtor caused it to cease doing business, stripping it of assets and leaving it a moribund shell to avoid payment to plaintiff, and that they continued to operate the business through other corporate entity defendants that the shareholders also dominated.
  8. Secon Service System v. St. Joseph Bk. Trust

    855 F.2d 406 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 52 times
    Affirming district court's refusal to hold parent corporation liable for alleged fraud and securities law violations
  9. 2406-12 Amsterdam Associates LLC v. Alianza LLC

    136 A.D.3d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 15 times

    215 151120/13. 02-16-2016 2406–12 AMSTERDAM ASSOCIATES LLC, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ALIANZA LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants.   Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York (David Yolkut of counsel), for appellants. Sperber Denenberg & Kahan, P.C., New York (Seth Denenberg of counsel), for respondent. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York (David Yolkut of counsel), for appellants. Sperber Denenberg & Kahan, P.C., New York (Seth Denenberg of counsel), for respondent. Opinion Order, Supreme Court, New

  10. Holmes v. Allstate Corp.

    11 Civ. 1543 (LTS) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2012)   Cited 19 times
    Finding Plaintiff's allegations of fraudulent transfer against Defendants as a group, without specifying what conduct was attributable to each, failed to satisfy the pleading standard under Rule 8
  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation