§Why CasetextPricing

Keyspan Gas East Corporation, Appellant,v.Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., Defendant, Century Indemnity Company et al., Respondents.

Brief

20 Cited authorities

  1. Fundamental Portfolio Advisors v. Tocqueville Asset

    7 N.Y.3d 96 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 456 times
    Holding contractual requirement of written consent may be waived if knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally abandoned

  2. Parochial v. Board of Educ

    60 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 827 times
    Holding that § 3813's notice of claim requirement "is not satisfied by presentment to any other individual or body"

  3. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 436 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata

  4. Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgmt

    73 F.3d 1178 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 212 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York law did not bar coverage of damages even though the insured knew, before the inception date of its policies, "that its products risked asbestosis and cancer diseases and had received a large number of claims"

  5. Cragg v. Allstate Indemnity Corporation

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4767 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 122 times

    No. 118. Argued May 4, 2011. decided June 9, 2011. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered May 7, 2010. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), which had granted defendant Allstate Indemnity Corporation's motion for summary judgment declaring that it had no obligation to defend or indemnify defendant insureds

  6. Boston Gas Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.

    454 Mass. 337 (Mass. 2009)   Cited 126 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding depends on the policy language at hand

  7. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co.

    138 N.J. 437 (N.J. 1994)   Cited 188 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that claims of asbestos-related property damage from installation through discovery or remediation (the injurious process) trigger the policies on the risk throughout that period"

  8. American Home Products v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

    748 F.2d 760 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 195 times
    Finding that property damage is physical injury occurring during the policy period

  9. Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

    221 F.3d 307 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 94 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that an insurer did not provide a “blanket denial,” because the insured continued to provide the insurer with notice and the insured and insurer continued to negotiate over liability

  10. R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

    171 Conn. App. 61 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)   Cited 42 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Adopting continuous-trigger theory in asbestos case because substance immediately injures body following exposure and theory accounts for unknowns in progression of disease, and continuous-trigger analysis is "the fairest and most efficient way to distribute indemnity and defense costs"

  11. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review