§Why CasetextPricing

Keyspan Gas East Corporation, Appellant,v.Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., Defendant, Century Indemnity Company et al., Respondents.

Brief

43 Cited authorities

  1. 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 144 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 2,077 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs sufficiently pled a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by alleging that the defendant, which contracted to convert its building into a cooperative, rejected bona fide purchase offers from prospective tenants

  2. Parochial v. Board of Educ

    60 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 824 times
    Holding that § 3813's notice of claim requirement "is not satisfied by presentment to any other individual or body"

  3. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 436 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata

  4. Breed v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer

    46 N.Y.2d 351 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 911 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no ambiguity exists where language has "definite and precise meaning, unattended by danger of misconception in the purport of the policy itself, and concerning which there is no reasonable basis for a difference of opinion"

  5. Olin Corp. v. Am. Home Assurance Co.

    704 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 217 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under New York law, courts are to apply the general rules of contract interpretation

  6. Hecht v. City of New York

    60 N.Y.2d 57 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 378 times
    Upholding Appellate Division's dismissal of negligence complaint because gap in sidewalk was trivial and therefore not actionable

  7. Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgmt

    73 F.3d 1178 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 212 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York law did not bar coverage of damages even though the insured knew, before the inception date of its policies, "that its products risked asbestosis and cancer diseases and had received a large number of claims"

  8. Chem. Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

    177 F.3d 210 (3d Cir. 1999)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2202 "permits the original [declaratory] judgment to be supplemented either by damages or by equitable relief . . ."

  9. Boston Gas Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.

    454 Mass. 337 (Mass. 2009)   Cited 126 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding depends on the policy language at hand

  10. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co.

    138 N.J. 437 (N.J. 1994)   Cited 188 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that claims of asbestos-related property damage from installation through discovery or remediation (the injurious process) trigger the policies on the risk throughout that period"

  11. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review