16 Cited authorities

  1. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 370 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  2. Pajak v. Pajak

    56 N.Y.2d 394 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 160 times
    In Pajak v. Pajak (56 N.Y.2d 394, 397) the Court confirms this adage (citing McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 74) saying "The failure of the Legislature to include a matter within a particular statute is an indication that its exclusion was intended".
  3. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District

    (N.Y. May. 12, 1998)   Cited 50 times
    In Majewski the New York Court of Appeals observed that "the date that legislation is to take effect is a separate question from whether the statute should apply to claims and rights then in existence.
  4. Pataki v. State Assembly

    824 N.E.2d 898 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 22 times
    In Pataki v New York State Assembly (4 NY3d 75, 100 [2004, Rosenblatt, J., concurring]), Judge Rosenblatt noted that the separation concept goes back to our first State Constitution in 1777, which was written a decade prior to the United States Constitution.
  5. Bright Homes v. Wright

    8 N.Y.2d 157 (N.Y. 1960)   Cited 88 times

    Argued June 8, 1960 Decided July 8, 1960 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, HAMILTON WARD, J. Arthur Lenhoff and George E. Gasner for appellant. Emory Gardiner and Harold Zucker for intervenor-respondent. FOSTER, J. Plaintiff, Bright Homes, Inc., the appellant herein, was granted a summary declaratory judgment by the Supreme Court in Erie County to the effect that rent controls in the City of Lackawanna ended July 1, 1959. The Appellate Division

  6. Hoerger v. Spota

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5708 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    2013-08-22 In the Matter of Maureen S. HOERGER et al., Appellants, v. Thomas J. SPOTA III, Respondent, et al., Respondent. Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants. Harris Beach PLLC, Uniondale (Thomas J. Garry of counsel), and Kevin G. Snover, North Babylon, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants. Harris Beach PLLC, Uniondale (Thomas J. Garry of counsel), and Kevin G. Snover, North Babylon, for respondent. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (John M

  7. Town of N. Hempstead v. Cnty. of Nassau

    102 A.D.3d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 5 times

    2013-01-16 In the Matter of Town of NORTH HEMPSTEAD, appellant-respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, respondent-appellant. Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel), for appellant-respondent. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jackie L. Gross of counsel), for respondent-appellant. REINALDO E. RIVERA Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel),

  8. People v. Mann

    288 N.E.2d 595 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 52 times
    In People v. Mann (31 N.Y.2d 253, 261 [1972]), the Court permitted the People to rebut an entrapment claim that the defense raised in its opening statement (see also, People v. Calvano, 30 N.Y.2d 199, 206 [1972]).
  9. Hoerger v. Spota

    109 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    2013-08-16 In the Matter of Maureen S. HOERGER, et al., appellants, v. Thomas J. SPOTA III, et al., respondents. MARK C. DILLON , J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ. In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16–102, inter alia, to invalidate petitions designating Thomas J. Spota III as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 10, 2013, for the nominations of the Democratic, Republican, Conservative, and Independence Parties

  10. Matter of Gallagher v. Regan

    366 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 37 times
    In Matter of Gallagher v Regan (42 N.Y.2d 230, supra), this Court articulated the checks-and-balances principle for such controversies, known as the doctrine of legislative equivalency. It applies to the operation of County Law § 204.