16 Cited authorities

Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York
41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976) Cited 408 times
Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor
Pajak v. Pajak
56 N.Y.2d 394 (N.Y. 1982) Cited 173 times
In Pajak v. Pajak, 56 N.Y.2d 394, a matrimonial action, plaintiff husband commenced an action for divorce on cruel and inhumane treatment grounds.
Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District
(N.Y. May. 12, 1998) Cited 75 times
In Majewski the New York Court of Appeals observed that "the date that legislation is to take effect is a separate question from whether the statute should apply to claims and rights then in existence."
Pataki v. State Assembly
4 N.Y.3d 75 (N.Y. 2004) Cited 22 times
In Pataki v New York State Assembly (4 NY3d 75, 100 [2004, Rosenblatt, J., concurring]), Judge Rosenblatt noted that the separation concept goes back to our first State Constitution in 1777, which was written a decade prior to the United States Constitution.
Hoerger v. Spota
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5708 (N.Y. 2013) Cited 11 times
2013-08-22 In the Matter of Maureen S. HOERGER et al., Appellants, v. Thomas J. SPOTA III, Respondent, et al., Respondent. Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants. Harris Beach PLLC, Uniondale (Thomas J. Garry of counsel), and Kevin G. Snover, North Babylon, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants. Harris Beach PLLC, Uniondale (Thomas J. Garry of counsel), and Kevin G. Snover, North Babylon, for respondent. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (John M
Bright Homes v. Wright
8 N.Y.2d 157 (N.Y. 1960) Cited 93 times
Argued June 8, 1960 Decided July 8, 1960 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, HAMILTON WARD, J. Arthur Lenhoff and George E. Gasner for appellant. Emory Gardiner and Harold Zucker for intervenor-respondent. FOSTER, J. Plaintiff, Bright Homes, Inc., the appellant herein, was granted a summary declaratory judgment by the Supreme Court in Erie County to the effect that rent controls in the City of Lackawanna ended July 1, 1959. The Appellate Division
Hoerger v. Spota
109 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013) Cited 8 times
2013-08-16 In the Matter of Maureen S. HOERGER, et al., appellants, v. Thomas J. SPOTA III, et al., respondents. MARK C. DILLON , J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ. In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16–102, inter alia, to invalidate petitions designating Thomas J. Spota III as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 10, 2013, for the nominations of the Democratic, Republican, Conservative, and Independence Parties
Town of N. Hempstead v. Cnty. of Nassau
102 A.D.3d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013) Cited 5 times
2013-01-16 In the Matter of Town of NORTH HEMPSTEAD, appellant-respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, respondent-appellant. Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel), for appellant-respondent. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jackie L. Gross of counsel), for respondent-appellant. REINALDO E. RIVERA Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel),
People v. Mann
31 N.Y.2d 253 (N.Y. 1972) Cited 53 times
In People v. Mann (31 N.Y.2d 253, 261 [1972]), the Court permitted the People to rebut an entrapment claim that the defense raised in its opening statement (see also, People v. Calvano, 30 N.Y.2d 199, 206 [1972]).
Matter of Gallagher v. Regan
42 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1977) Cited 38 times
In Matter of Gallagher v Regan (42 N.Y.2d 230, supra), this Court articulated the checks-and-balances principle for such controversies, known as the doctrine of legislative equivalency.

In the Matter of Town of North Hempstead, Appellant-Respondent,v.County of Nassau, Respondent-Appellant.

16 Cited authorities

In Pajak v. Pajak, 56 N.Y.2d 394, a matrimonial action, plaintiff husband commenced an action for divorce on cruel and inhumane treatment grounds.

In Majewski the New York Court of Appeals observed that "the date that legislation is to take effect is a separate question from whether the statute should apply to claims and rights then in existence."

In Pataki v New York State Assembly (4 NY3d 75, 100 [2004, Rosenblatt, J., concurring]), Judge Rosenblatt noted that the separation concept goes back to our first State Constitution in 1777, which was written a decade prior to the United States Constitution.

In People v. Mann (31 N.Y.2d 253, 261 [1972]), the Court permitted the People to rebut an entrapment claim that the defense raised in its opening statement (see also, People v. Calvano, 30 N.Y.2d 199, 206 [1972]).

In Matter of Gallagher v Regan (42 N.Y.2d 230, supra), this Court articulated the checks-and-balances principle for such controversies, known as the doctrine of legislative equivalency.