§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Town of North Hempstead, Appellant-Respondent,v.County of Nassau, Respondent-Appellant.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Assoc. Home v. Defenders of Wildlife

    551 U.S. 644 (2007)   Cited 868 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a stray erroneous statement in the Federal Register "which could have had no effect on the underlying agency action being challenged" is not "the type of error that requires a remand"

  2. Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach

    523 U.S. 26 (1998)   Cited 844 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because the remand requirement is absolute, the transferee court may not invoke the change-of-venue statute to assign transferred cases to itself for trial

  3. Association of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    22 F.3d 1150 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times
    Explaining relationship between § 7106 and § 7106(b)

  4. Town of N. Hempstead v. Cnty. of Nassau

    102 A.D.3d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 5 times

    2013-01-16 In the Matter of Town of NORTH HEMPSTEAD, appellant-respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, respondent-appellant. Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel), for appellant-respondent. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jackie L. Gross of counsel), for respondent-appellant. REINALDO E. RIVERA Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel),

  5. People v. Mann

    31 N.Y.2d 253 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 53 times
    In People v. Mann (31 N.Y.2d 253, 261 [1972]), the Court permitted the People to rebut an entrapment claim that the defense raised in its opening statement (see also, People v. Calvano, 30 N.Y.2d 199, 206 [1972]).

  6. People ex Rel. B.P. Comm. v. Common Council

    127 N.E. 593 (N.Y. 1920)   Cited 9 times

    Argued April 13, 1920 Decided April 27, 1920 William A. Walsh, Corporation Counsel ( Thomas M. Smith of counsel), for city of Yonkers, appellant. William A. Davidson and Charles M. Carter for county of Westchester, appellant. Charles Harvey Peck and Theodosius Stevens for respondent. McLAUGHLIN, J. The defendants separately appeal from an order of the Appellate Division, second department, affirming an order of the Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus. The writ directs