7 Cited authorities

  1. Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.

    14 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 386 times
    Holding that " demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures."
  2. Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Boyle

    178 Cal.App.4th 1020 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 206 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Ruling on a demurrer
  3. Mahan v. Charles W. Chan Ins. Agency, Inc.

    14 Cal.App.5th 841 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that elders were deprived of property, within the meaning of the Elder Abuse Law, because they were forced to "reach into their pockets and sell assets to provide more cash" to a trust of which their daughter was the trustee, to keep a life insurance policy held by the trust in force
  4. A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.

    38 Cal.App.5th 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 23 times
    Standing is a question of law to which we apply a de novo standard of review
  5. Dumas v. L.A. Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors

    45 Cal.App.5th 348 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 16 times
    In Dumas, the plaintiff contended that the defendant "failed to properly meet and confer" because the defendant's written request to meet and confer "did not satisfy section 430.41's requirement of a meeting 'in person or by telephone.'"
  6. Jamulians Against the Casino v. Iwasaki

    205 Cal.App.4th 632 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    No. C067138. 2012-04-26 JAMULIANS AGAINST THE CASINO, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Randell IWASAKI, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent;Jamul Indian Tribe, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Oakland; Stephan C. Volker, Joshua A.H. Harris and Daniel P. Garrett–Steinman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Ronald W. Beals, Chief Counsel, Thomas C. Fellenz, Deputy Chief Counsel, David H. McCray, Assistant Chief Counsel, Brandon Sheldon Walker and Elizabeth

  7. Bacon v. Wahrhaftig

    97 Cal.App.2d 599 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)   Cited 25 times
    In Bacon v. Wahrhaftig, 97 Cal.App.2d 599, it was said at page 605 [ 218 P.2d 144]: "Such a demurrer for uncertainty is not intended to reach the failure to incorporate sufficient facts in the pleading, but is directed at the uncertainty existing in the allegations actually made."