5 Cited authorities

  1. Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.

    14 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 379 times
    Holding that " demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures."
  2. Jarman v. HCR Manorcare, Inc.

    10 Cal.5th 375 (Cal. 2020)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that "courts ‘may not rewrite a statute ...’ "
  3. A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.

    38 Cal.App.5th 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 21 times
    Standing is a question of law to which we apply a de novo standard of review
  4. Jamulians Against the Casino v. Iwasaki

    205 Cal.App.4th 632 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    No. C067138. 2012-04-26 JAMULIANS AGAINST THE CASINO, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Randell IWASAKI, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent;Jamul Indian Tribe, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Oakland; Stephan C. Volker, Joshua A.H. Harris and Daniel P. Garrett–Steinman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Ronald W. Beals, Chief Counsel, Thomas C. Fellenz, Deputy Chief Counsel, David H. McCray, Assistant Chief Counsel, Brandon Sheldon Walker and Elizabeth

  5. City of Plymouth v. Superior Court

    8 Cal.App.3d 454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. 12309. May 4, 1970. COUNSEL Wilson, Jones, Morton Lynch and Robert G. Auwbrey for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Brown, Dick Reece and David H. Rule for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION JANES, J. The City of Plymouth (hereinafter "petitioner") seeks a peremptory writ prohibiting respondent superior court from proceeding further with an action brought against petitioner by real parties in interest, who are property owners. Their suit against petitioner alleges that their property