Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.
14 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993) Cited 385 timesHolding that " demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures."
Jarman v. HCR Manorcare, Inc.
10 Cal.5th 375 (Cal. 2020) Cited 39 timesNoting that "courts ‘may not rewrite a statute ...’ "
A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.
38 Cal.App.5th 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019) Cited 22 timesStanding is a question of law to which we apply a de novo standard of review
Jamulians Against the Casino v. Iwasaki
205 Cal.App.4th 632 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 2 timesNo. C067138. 2012-04-26 JAMULIANS AGAINST THE CASINO, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Randell IWASAKI, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent;Jamul Indian Tribe, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Oakland; Stephan C. Volker, Joshua A.H. Harris and Daniel P. Garrett–Steinman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Ronald W. Beals, Chief Counsel, Thomas C. Fellenz, Deputy Chief Counsel, David H. McCray, Assistant Chief Counsel, Brandon Sheldon Walker and Elizabeth
City of Plymouth v. Superior Court
8 Cal.App.3d 454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970) Cited 15 timesDocket No. 12309. May 4, 1970. COUNSEL Wilson, Jones, Morton Lynch and Robert G. Auwbrey for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Brown, Dick Reece and David H. Rule for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION JANES, J. The City of Plymouth (hereinafter "petitioner") seeks a peremptory writ prohibiting respondent superior court from proceeding further with an action brought against petitioner by real parties in interest, who are property owners. Their suit against petitioner alleges that their property