§Why CasetextPricing

Motion for Summary Judgment and or Adjudication

undefined

8 Cited authorities

  1. Lantzy v. Centex Homes

    31 Cal.4th 363 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 524 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California's equitable tolling doctrine operates to toll a statute of limitations for a claim asserted by a continuously confined civil detainee who has pursued his claim in good faith

  2. Kids' Universe v. In2Labs

    95 Cal.App.4th 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 349 times
    Finding expert testimony insufficient to demonstrate lost profits where a small toy store claimed that flood damage to the store caused by defendant led to $50 million in lost profits because Plaintiff's new website would have allowed it to compete in the Internet toy marketing business

  3. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.

    40 Cal.4th 623 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 248 times
    Holding a cigarette smoker's reliance on tobacco companies' misrepresentations of the addictive nature of cigarettes was unreasonable once she suspected she was addicted to cigarettes, as evidenced by her decision to join "Nicotine Anonymous"

  4. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National Bank

    179 Cal.App.3d 1061 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 322 times
    Following majority rule that a named depositor is not an "adverse claimant" to account

  5. Prof'l Collection Consultants v. Lauron

    8 Cal.App.5th 958 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 124 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Underlying theory of relief indicated gravamen of complaint was breach of contract despite claims labeled as "account stated" and "open book account"

  6. Mission Viejo Emergency Med. Assoc. v. Beta Healthcare Grp.

    197 Cal.App.4th 1146 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 83 times
    Noting that under the holding in Concepcion the "[g]eneral state law doctrine pertaining to unconscionability is preserved unless it involves a defense that applies 'only to arbitration or that derive[its] meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue'"

  7. Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New York

    181 Cal.App.4th 175 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 82 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding misrepresentation was material based on underwriter's uncontroverted declaration that truthful disclosure would have affected insured's premium or precluded policy issuance

  8. Eilke v. Rice

    45 Cal.2d 66 (Cal. 1955)   Cited 18 times

    Docket No. L.A. 23639. August 5, 1955. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James G. Whyte, Judge. Reversed. Moore, Trinkaus Binns and Walter R. Trinkaus for Appellant. Morrison, Hohfeld, Foerster, Shuman Clark as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant. Vaughan Brandlin, J.R. Vaughan, Richard I. Roemer and Warren J. Lane for Respondent. SHENK, J. This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. On August 1