§Why CasetextPricing

Lappin v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company

Motion to Certify a Question to the Supreme Court of Ohio

14 Cited authorities

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona

    520 U.S. 43 (1997)   Cited 2,516 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff's challenge to a state law affecting the performance of her job duties was mooted when she left state employment

  2. Lehman Brothers v. Schein

    416 U.S. 386 (1974)   Cited 761 times
    Holding that the decision to certify a case a question is within the “sound discretion” of federal courts

  3. Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.

    33 F.3d 716 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 537 times
    Holding that second factor weighed against dismissal without prejudice where plaintiff waited more than five years to request voluntary dismissal

  4. Long Beach Assn., Inc. v. Jones

    82 Ohio St. 3d 574 (Ohio 1998)   Cited 158 times
    Characterizing contract construction as an issue of law

  5. Scott v. Bank One Trust Co., N.A.

    62 Ohio St. 3d 39 (Ohio 1991)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that the Ohio Supreme Court has the power under the Ohio Constitution to answer questions certified to it by a federal court

  6. Planned v. Strickland

    531 F.3d 406 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 06-4422, 06-4423. Argued: April 23, 2008. Decided and Filed: June 23, 2008. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Susan J. Dlott, J. ARGUED: Anne Berry Strait, Office of the Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellants. Mimi Y.C., Liu, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Washington, DC, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Anne Berry Strait, Office of the Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellants. Alphonse A. Gerhardstein, Gerhardstein Branch Co

  7. Ostendorf v. Grange Indem. Ins. Co.

    Case No. 2:19-CV-1147 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2020)   Cited 10 times
    Finding that the calculation of the actual cash value of plaintiff's vehicle was not dependent on whether she actually replaced it

  8. Davis v. GEICO Cas. Co.

    Case No. 2:19-cv-2477 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2020)   Cited 9 times
    Denying Defendant's motion to dismiss under Ohio law because "there is some question as to whether the [ACV] at the time of the loss . . . actually includes sales tax, title-transfer fees, and registration fees"

  9. Geib v. Amoco Oil Co.

    29 F.3d 1050 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that Amoco's delay was appropriate because the intent of the statute was to discourage termination at the first suspicion of wrong doing and noting that at least one incident of misreporting occurred within the statute's time limit

  10. Cordray v. Planned Parenthood

    2009 Ohio 2972 (Ohio 2009)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 2008-1234. Submitted March 10, 2008. Decided July 1, 2009. ON ORDER from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Certifying Questions of State Law, Nos. 06-4422 and 06-4423. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Stephen P. Carney and Elisabeth A. Long, Deputy Solicitors, and Anne Berry Strait and Sharon A. Jennings, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioner. Gerhardstein Branch Co, L.P.A., Alphonse A. Gerhardstein, and Jennifer L. Branch;

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,885 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Section 3901-1-54 - Unfair property/casualty claims settlement practices

    Ohio Admin. Code 3901-1-54   Cited 39 times
    Defining ACV as "replacement cost of property at the time of loss, including sales tax, less any depreciation"