§Why CasetextPricing

Team Marketing Group Inc et al v. Hyde et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

9 Cited authorities

  1. Koerner v. CMR Constr. & Roofing, L.L.C.

    910 F.3d 221 (5th Cir. 2018)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that "[s]elf-serving allegations are not the type of significant probative evidence required to defeat summary judgment," and "a vague or conclusory affidavit [without more] is insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact in the face of conflicting probative evidence."

  2. Riggins v. Dixie Shoring Co., Inc

    590 So. 2d 1164 (La. 1992)   Cited 141 times
    Finding that the corporate veil may be pierced when: the corporation acts as an "alter ego" of the shareholders and the shareholders have used the corporation to defraud a third party, and/or the shareholders have failed to observe corporate formalities to the extent the corporation ceases to be distinguishable from its shareholders

  3. Greene v. Gulf Coast Bank

    593 So. 2d 630 (La. 1992)   Cited 92 times
    Finding no duty to disclose when there was not a fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the plaintiff

  4. First Am. Bankcard, Inc. v. Smart Bus. Tech., Inc.

    178 F. Supp. 3d 390 (E.D. La. 2016)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a plaintiff had standing to bring a LUTPA claim in addition to a breach of contract claim when the allegations supporting the LUTPA claim were "similar to the breach of contract claim, but not identical ..., since there are different elements alleged for each claim"

  5. Becnel v. Grodner

    982 So. 2d 891 (La. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 40 times

    No. 2007-CA-1041. April 2, 2008. Appeal from the District Court, Orleans Parish, No. 2006-2701, Herbert Cade, J. Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Becnel Law Firm, L.L.C., Reserve, LA, in Proper Person, Plaintiff/Appellant. Richard C. Stanley, Melissa Vander-brook Beaugh, Stanley, Flanagan Reuter, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC, Henri Wolbrette, III, Kathleen Manning, R. Marshall Grodner. (Court composed of Judge JAMES F. McKAY III, Judge EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge LEON A. CANNIZZARO JR

  6. Taylor v. Dowling Gosslee

    22 So. 3d 246 (La. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 30 times

    No. 44,654-CA. October 7, 2009. Appeal from the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Bossier, No. 111223, Parker Self, J. Harper Law Firm by Jerald R. Harper, Shreveport, for Appellants. Joseph W. Hendrix Hayes, Harkey, Smith Counsel Cascio, L.L.P. by Thomas M. Hayes, III, Monroe, Walter O. Hunter, Jr., Shreveport, for Appellees Dowling Gosslee Associates, Inc. and James S. Dowling. Larry Feldman, Jr., New Orleans, for Appellee West Viking Drive, L.L.C. Before STEWART, PEATROSS and MOORE

  7. Central Facilities Operating Co. v. Cinemark USA, Inc.

    36 F. Supp. 3d 700 (M.D. La. 2014)   Cited 14 times

    Civil Action No. 11–660–JJB. 2014-08-06 CENTRAL FACILITIES OPERATING COMPANY, L.L.C. v. CINEMARK USA, INC. et al. Thomas E. Balhoff, Carlton Jones, III, Judith R.E. Atkinson, Luke F. Piontek, Shelley Ann McGlathery Roedel, Parsons, Koch, Blache, Balhoff & McCollister, Baton Rouge, LA, for Central Facilities Operating Company, L.L.C. Lawrence E. Abbott, Byron D. Kitchens, Charles H. Abbott, Cotton Schmidt & Abbott, LLP, New Orleans, LA, Gregory P. Aycock, Nancy Brechtel, Aycock Law Firm, LLC, Baton

  8. Franz v. Iolab, Inc.

    801 F. Supp. 1537 (E.D. La. 1992)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that a release of all claims barred wrongful discharge and ERISA claims

  9. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,083 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party