12 Cited authorities

NTP, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.
418 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2005) Cited 459 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that users of accused system could not infringe method claims in the United States because one step of the method was performed in Canada
Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
550 U.S. 437 (2007) Cited 49 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that Windows "software, uncoupled from a medium" was not a "combinable component" and that "a copy of Windows, not Windows in the abstract, qualifies as a 'component' under § 271(f)."
Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. Marvell Tech. Grp., Ltd.
807 F.3d 1283 (Fed. Cir. 2015) Cited 72 times 6 Legal Analyses
Finding that the jury was properly told that it may consider any foreign sales that resulted from infringing use in the United States in order to value that use
Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.
727 F.2d 1506 (Fed. Cir. 1984) Cited 162 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that it is "neither error nor dangerous to justice to submit legal issues to juries"
Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.
531 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2008) Cited 66 times 1 Legal Analyses
Concluding that “the relevant ‘issue’ which [d]efendants are precluded from re-litigating is the ultimate determination on patent validity itself.”
Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.
526 F. Supp. 2d 985 (N.D. Cal. 2007) Cited 25 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding validity is single issue
Ziptronix, Inc. v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.
71 F. Supp. 3d 1090 (N.D. Cal. 2014) Cited 10 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that " plaintiff cannot raise a claim for the first time in response to a motion for summary judgment," and therefore plaintiff could not allege a new theory of liability in its response brief
CNET Networks, Inc. v. Etilize, Inc.
528 F. Supp. 2d 985 (N.D. Cal. 2007) Cited 14 times
In CNET Networks, the patent concerned claimed methods and systems for automatically creating an electronic catalog of product information gathered from various internet websites.
Telecom v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
39 F. Supp. 3d 1080 (N.D. Cal. 2014) Cited 5 times
Holding that a method for correcting errors in telecommunication was not abstract where its purpose was "more accurate and efficient data transmission"
Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. Marvell Tech. Grp., Ltd.
805 F.3d 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2015) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
No. 2014–1492. 2015-11-17 CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff–Appellee v. MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Defendants–Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:09–cv–00290–NBF, Judge Nora Barry Fischer. On Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. Patrick Joseph McElhinny, K & L Gates LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Mark G. Knedeisen
Section 271 - Infringement of patent
35 U.S.C. § 271 Cited 6,055 times 1055 Legal Analyses
Holding that testing is a "use"

Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that users of accused system could not infringe method claims in the United States because one step of the method was performed in Canada

Holding that Windows "software, uncoupled from a medium" was not a "combinable component" and that "a copy of Windows, not Windows in the abstract, qualifies as a 'component' under § 271(f)."

Finding that the jury was properly told that it may consider any foreign sales that resulted from infringing use in the United States in order to value that use

Holding that it is "neither error nor dangerous to justice to submit legal issues to juries"

Concluding that “the relevant ‘issue’ which [d]efendants are precluded from re-litigating is the ultimate determination on patent validity itself.”

Holding validity is single issue

Explaining that " plaintiff cannot raise a claim for the first time in response to a motion for summary judgment," and therefore plaintiff could not allege a new theory of liability in its response brief

In CNET Networks, the patent concerned claimed methods and systems for automatically creating an electronic catalog of product information gathered from various internet websites.

Holding that a method for correcting errors in telecommunication was not abstract where its purpose was "more accurate and efficient data transmission"

Holding that testing is a "use"