§Why CasetextPricing

The People of the State of New York by Andrew M. Cuomo,, Respondent,v.Maurice R. Greenberg, et al., Appellants.

Brief

22 Cited authorities

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr

    518 U.S. 470 (1996)   Cited 2,414 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the presence of a state-law damages remedy for violations of FDA requirements does not impose an additional requirement upon medical device manufacturers but "merely provides another reason for manufacturers to comply with . . . federal law"

  2. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission

    446 U.S. 680 (1980)   Cited 777 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that scienter is an element of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and Section 17, but not Section 17 or

  3. Alfred L. Snapp Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico

    458 U.S. 592 (1982)   Cited 536 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state has a legally protectable interest in enforcing its legal code

  4. Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn

    375 U.S. 96 (1963)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he purpose of Congress is the ultimate touchstone" of preemption analysis

  5. Lander v. Hartford Life Annuity Ins. Co.

    251 F.3d 101 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 169 times
    Holding that variable annuity contracts constituted "covered securities" as defined by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998

  6. Texas Office, Public Utility Counsel v. FC.C

    183 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that Texas has standing to challenge the FCC's assertion of authority over an aspect of telecommunications regulation that the State believed it controlled

  7. Castillo v. Cameron County

    238 F.3d 339 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that the fact that a party could be found in contempt for violating the court order in the future was a sufficient injury to provide standing for a pre-enforcement challenge to the decree

  8. Hood ex Rel. Mississippi v. Microsoft Corp.

    428 F. Supp. 2d 537 (S.D. Miss. 2006)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that Mississippi was real party in interest even though it also sought to recover damages for private parties because it sought injunctive relief that was "aimed at securing an honest marketplace"

  9. All Seasons Resorts v. Abrams

    68 N.Y.2d 81 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 51 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that membership certificates in a system of outdoor resort campgrounds, which entitled the certificate owners to the use of the campgrounds but no share on income or gain from their operation were not securities, because “[f]or an interest to be a security under Howey, there must be an expectation of financial gain or profit. There is simply none here”

  10. State v. Andresen

    256 Conn. 313 (Conn. 2001)   Cited 26 times
    Positing that requiring specific intent "as a predicate to enforcing prohibition on the sale of unregistered securities effectively would diminish the statute's remedial purpose"

  11. Section 77r - Exemption from State regulation of securities offerings

    15 U.S.C. § 77r   Cited 201 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing state authority to regulate offerings of securities that are completely intra-state

  12. Section 36b-2 - (Formerly Sec. 36-470). Short title: Connecticut Uniform Securities Act

    Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36b-2   Cited 5 times

    Sections 36b-2 to 36b-34, inclusive, may be cited as the "Connecticut Uniform Securities Act". Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36b-2 (P.A. 77-482, S. 1; P.A. 10-141, S. 2.) Amended by P.A. 10-0141, S. 2 of the February 2010 Regular Session, eff. 6/7/2010. Annotation to former section 36-470: Cited. 219 C. 204.

  13. Section 5105 - Electronic records and signatures

    Vt. Stat. tit. 9 § 5105

    This chapter modifies, limits, and supersedes 15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq., but does not modify, limit, or supersede 15 U.S.C. § 7001(c) or authorize electronic delivery of any of the notices described in 15 U.S.C. § 7003(b). This chapter authorizes the filing of records and signatures, when specified by provisions of this chapter or by a rule adopted or order issued under this chapter, in a manner consistent with 15 U.S.C. § 7004(a). 9 V.S.A. § 5105 Added 2005, No. 11 , § 1, eff. 7/1/2006.