§Why CasetextPricing

The People of the State of New York by Andrew M. Cuomo,, Respondent,v.Maurice R. Greenberg, et al., Appellants.

Brief

139 Cited authorities

  1. Basic Inc. v. Levinson

    485 U.S. 224 (1988)   Cited 3,347 times   307 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the District Court appropriately certified the class based on the presumption of reliance

  2. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

    552 U.S. 148 (2008)   Cited 1,181 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"

  3. Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp

    68 N.Y.2d 320 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 21,211 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Finding summary judgment appropriate by relying on a treating doctor's unrebutted deposition testimony

  4. Central Bank of Denver v. First I.S. Bk. of Denver

    511 U.S. 164 (1994)   Cited 1,692 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 10(b)’s private right of action does not include suits against aiders and abettors

  5. Zuckerman v. City of N.Y.

    49 N.Y.2d 557 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 24,815 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Granting summary judgment as the city's arguments were considered speculation and this was "patently inadequate to establish the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial . . ."

  6. Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelder

    425 U.S. 185 (1976)   Cited 3,485 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 9(f) “contains a state-of-mind condition requiring something more than negligence”

  7. Lampf v. Gilbertson

    501 U.S. 350 (1991)   Cited 1,114 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding comparable bar not subject to equitable tolling

  8. Merrill v. Dabit

    547 U.S. 71 (2006)   Cited 668 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law class action securities fraud claims brought by “holders” of securities are, just like those of “purchasers” and “sellers,” preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act

  9. Perrin v. United States

    444 U.S. 37 (1979)   Cited 1,120 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that commercial bribery falls under the definition of bribery under the Travel Act, which was passed nine years before RICO was enacted

  10. Garrett v. United States

    471 U.S. 773 (1985)   Cited 858 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that multiple punishments are permissible "when the legislative intent is clear from the face of the statute or the legislative history"

  11. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,464 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

  12. Section 77 - Discrimination against neutral Americans in time of war

    15 U.S.C. § 77   Cited 1,802 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting right of recovery to " any person acquiring such security (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition he knew of such untruth or omission)"

  13. Section 78a - Short title

    15 U.S.C. § 78a   Cited 1,724 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Emphasizing considerations of federalism in SLUSA's legislative findings

  14. Section 78c - Definitions and application

    15 U.S.C. § 78c   Cited 1,666 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Exempting certain "note" with maturities of less than nine months from the definition of "security" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

  15. Section 78n - Proxies

    15 U.S.C. § 78n   Cited 1,623 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating § 78m(d) by reference

  16. Section 77b - Definitions; promotion of efficiency, competition, and capital formation

    15 U.S.C. § 77b   Cited 1,404 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Instructing the SEC to consider, "in addition to the protection of investors, whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation"

  17. Section 77a - Short title

    15 U.S.C. § 77a   Cited 1,231 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Titling act

  18. Section 78m - Periodical and other reports

    15 U.S.C. § 78m   Cited 1,203 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing Commission to adopt disclosure requirements for certain repurchases of securities by issuer

  19. Section 78o - Registration and regulation of brokers and dealers

    15 U.S.C. § 78o   Cited 977 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Requiring broker-dealers to be FINRA members

  20. Section 78bb - Effect on existing law

    15 U.S.C. § 78bb   Cited 906 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting definition of "covered security" found in paragraphs and of section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933