§Why CasetextPricing

The People of the State of New York by Andrew M. Cuomo,, Respondent,v.Maurice R. Greenberg, et al., Appellants.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

    552 U.S. 148 (2008)   Cited 1,181 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"

  2. Central Bank of Denver v. First I.S. Bk. of Denver

    511 U.S. 164 (1994)   Cited 1,691 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 10(b)’s private right of action does not include suits against aiders and abettors

  3. Supt. of Insurance v. Bankers Life Cas. Co.

    404 U.S. 6 (1971)   Cited 786 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a violation of Rule 10b-5 can occur even when the deception does not occur alongside the purchase or sale of securities

  4. Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.

    69 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. Pa. 1946)   Cited 175 times
    Finding private cause of action under section 10(b) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 of the SEC

  5. Section 78bb - Effect on existing law

    15 U.S.C. § 78bb   Cited 906 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting definition of "covered security" found in paragraphs and of section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933

  6. Section 7246 - Fair funds for investors

    15 U.S.C. § 7246   Cited 43 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Creating the "Fair Fund" established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to distribute disgorgement penalties to defrauded investors