§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Norman E. Roth, et al., Appellants,v.City of Syracuse, et al., Respondents. (And Other Proceedings.)

Brief

35 Cited authorities

  1. 300 Gramatan v. Human Rights

    45 N.Y.2d 176 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 2,303 times
    In 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights (45 NY2d 176), we stated that "substantial evidence consists of proof within the whole record of such quality and quantity as to generate conviction in and persuade a fair and detached fact finder that, from that proof as a premise, a conclusion or ultimate fact may be extracted reasonably — probatively and logically" (id. at 181).

  2. Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl

    80 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 424 times
    Relying on expressio unius, statutory language, and legislative history to foreclose expansion of listed damages remedies

  3. Juarez v. Wavecrest Mgt. Team

    88 N.Y.2d 628 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that when a landlord has notice that a child under age six is living in an apartment built before 1960 with peeling paint, the landlord has constructive notice of a hazardous lead-based paint condition

  4. FMC Corp. v. Unmack

    92 N.Y.2d 179 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 231 times

    92 N.Y.2d 179 699 N.E.2d 893, 677 N.Y.S.2d 269 In the Matter of FMC CORPORATION (PEROXYGEN CHEMICALS DIVISION), Appellant, v. David UNMACK, as Assessor of Town of Tonawanda, et al., Respondents, et al., Intervenor-Respondent. In the Matter of SOUTH SLOPE HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF the TOWN OF JERUSALEM et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.) In the Matter of SOUTH SLOPE HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF the TOWN OF JERUSALEM et

  5. Chapman v. Silber

    97 N.Y.2d 9 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 208 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, historically, "[c]ourts opined that conveyance of possession by lease was similar in effect to conveyance of title"

  6. City of Buffalo v. Clement Co.

    28 N.Y.2d 241 (N.Y. 1971)   Cited 325 times
    Holding that a de facto taking had occurred at a date earlier than the actual date of taking because the ten-year long protracted delay between the announcement of the taking and the actual date of the taking had significantly destroyed the value of the defendant's property

  7. In re N.Y.C. Coalition to End Lead Poisoning v. Vallone

    100 N.Y.2d 337 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 109 times
    Invalidating Local Law 38 due to City Council's failure to include lead dust in the “Negative Declaration” of environmental effects mandated by SEQRA

  8. Allied Corp. v. Town of Camillus

    80 N.Y.2d 351 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Allied Corp., where the Court once again reiterated the need for cautious use of the reproduction cost method, it stated that "courts are interested in making certain that governments are not forced to pay the high valuations typically produced by the reproduction cost less depreciation method" where "the owner would likely discontinue the use on his own in the absence of the taking" (80 N.Y.2d, at 359-360).

  9. In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency

    20 A.D.3d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 49 times

    CA 04-01506. June 10, 2005. CROSS APPEALS from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Charles T. Major, J.), entered February 13, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 5. The judgment awarded respondents $433,220, together with interest and costs. Hiscock Barclay, LLP, Buffalo ( Mark R. McNamara of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Law Offices of Robert A. Gladstone, Belle Mead, New Jersey ( Robert A. Gladstone of the New Jersey Bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for r

  10. Commerce Corp v. Assessors Bd.

    88 N.Y.2d 724 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 64 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Affirming income capitalization method combined with sales comparison approach for land only

  11. Section 2681 - Definitions

    15 U.S.C. § 2681   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining "Target housing" that is subject to the Lead Disclosure Rule

  12. Section 202.59 - Tax assessment review proceedings in counties outside the City of New York; special rules

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 202.59   Cited 162 times

    (a) Applicability. This section shall apply to every tax assessment review proceeding brought pursuant to title 1 of article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law in counties outside the City of New York. (b) Statement of income and expenses. Before the note of issue and certificate of readiness may be filed, the petitioner shall have served on the respondent, in triplicate, a statement that the property is not income-producing, or a copy of a verified or certified statement of the income and expenses on