§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc., Respondent,v.Christopher Dal Piaz, et al., Appellants.

Brief

26 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Sprinzen

    46 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 394 times
    Approving arbitrator's award enforcing restrictive employment covenant

  2. Benjamin v. Koeppel

    85 N.Y.2d 549 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 133 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a fee sharing arrangement between attorneys was enforceable, even though one attorney failed to register with the state as required

  3. Lloyd Corp. v. Henchar, Inc.

    80 N.Y.2d 124 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding loan agreement that violated SBIA regulations enforceable

  4. Charlebois v. Weller Assocs

    72 N.Y.2d 587 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 96 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Disallowing quantum meruit recovery on the same grounds

  5. Simaee v. Levi

    22 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 31 times

    2003-05258. October 11, 2005. In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has a one-third ownership interest in the defendant Ambulatory Surgery Center of Brooklyn, and to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated March 28, 2003, as granted those branches of the defendants' motion which were to dismiss the second, fourth

  6. Facilities Dev. v. Miletta

    180 A.D.2d 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 50 times
    Denying claim for implied indemnification, stating: "If, in fact, Detroit breached its obligations under its contract with Mechanical and thereby caused all or a portion of the economic loss sustained by plaintiff, Miletta cannot be held liable for the same loss because the proximate cause of that loss would be Detroit's breach of contract, not anything Miletta did or did not do."

  7. Glassman v. Prohealth Ambulatory Surgery Center

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4660 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 105. Argued May 4, 2010. Decided June 3, 2010. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ira B. Warshawsky, J.), entered January 16, 2009. The Supreme Court awarded plaintiff $925,000 for attorney's fees, costs and interest, in addition to a principal amount of damages previously awarded. The appeal brings up for review a prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered October

  8. Rosasco Creameries, Inc., v. Cohen

    276 N.Y. 274 (N.Y. 1937)   Cited 173 times
    In John E. Rosasco Creameries v. Cohen, 276 N.Y. 274, 11 N.E.2d 908, 118 A.L.R. 641 (1937), cited in Magasiny, an action was brought by a milk dealer against another milk dealer to recover the agreed price of milk sold.

  9. Chirra v. Bommareddy

    22 A.D.3d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 11 times

    6609. October 4, 2005. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about July 15, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion for summary judgment by Action No. 1 plaintiff/Action No. 2 defendant Chirra, Action No. 1 plaintiff Lenox Pharmacy, Action No. 2 defendants Lebanon Pharmacy and New Lebanon Pharmacy, and Action No. 3 defendants Talamati and Balaji Pharmacy, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Allegaert Berger Vogel LLP, New York (David

  10. Cherokee Owners Corp. v. DNA Contracting, LLC

    96 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 5 times

    2012-06-7 CHEROKEE OWNERS CORP., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DNA CONTRACTING, LLC, et al., Defendants, JMA Consultants, Inc., et al., Defendants–Respondents. [And a Third–Party Action]. Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP, New York (Carol A. Sigmond of counsel), for appellant. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York (Brian J. Carey of counsel), for respondents. TOM Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP, New York (Carol A. Sigmond of counsel), for appellant. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter

  11. Section 401.2 - Limitations of operating certificates

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 10 § 401.2   Cited 4 times

    Operating certificates are issued to established operators subject to the following limitations and conditions: (a) The medical facility shall control admission and discharge of patients or residents to assure that occupancy shall not exceed the bed capacity specified in the operating certificate, except that a hospital may temporarily exceed such capacity in an emergency. (b) An operating certificate shall be used only by the established operator for the designated site of operation, except that