18 Cited authorities

  1. Pacific Gas Elec. v. Energy Resources Comm'n

    461 U.S. 190 (1983)   Cited 1,172 times
    Holding "that the promotion of nuclear power is not to be accomplished ‘at all costs’ "
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

    462 U.S. 87 (1983)   Cited 1,148 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential" when examining an agency decision made "within its area of special expertise, at the frontiers of science"
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

    464 U.S. 238 (1984)   Cited 914 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state award of punitive damages to person injured in nuclear incident did not conflict with federal remedial scheme regulating safety aspects of nuclear energy
  4. Nuclear Information Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    969 F.2d 1169 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that requiring agency to implement hearing procedures not specified in statute could “violate the Supreme Court's admonition in [Vermont Yankee ] against the judicial fashioning of administrative procedures that neither Congress nor the agency has sanctioned.”
  5. Bullcreek v. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n

    359 F.3d 536 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 12 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the NRC has authority to license and regulate the storage and disposal of SNF
  6. Siegel v. Atomic Energy Commission

    400 F.2d 778 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 54 times
    Discussing defense and internal security capabilities in creation of Enemy of the State Rule
  7. Cty. of Rockland v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

    709 F.2d 766 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 1234, 1324, Dockets 83-4003, 83-4037. Argued April 14, 1983. Decided May 27, 1983. Eric Ole Thorsen, Asst. County Atty., County of Rockland, New City, N.Y. (Marc L. Parris, County Atty., County of Rockland, New City, N.Y., of counsel), for petitioner. Michael B. Blume, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Washington, D.C. (Herzel H.E. Plaine, Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Crane, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, E. Leo Slaggie, Acting Sol., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Washington, D.C., Carol E. Dinkins, Asst

  8. Section 4321 - Congressional declaration of purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 4321   Cited 3,496 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Describing the purposes of NEPA as including "encourag[ing] productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment"
  9. Section 2011 - Congressional declaration of policy

    42 U.S.C. § 2011   Cited 423 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Atomic energy is capable of application for peaceful as well as military purposes. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that- (a) the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security; and (b) the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to promote

  10. Section 2133 - Commercial licenses

    42 U.S.C. § 2133   Cited 48 times

    (a) Conditions The Commission is authorized to issue licenses to persons applying therefor to transfer or receive in interstate commerce, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, possess, use, import, or export under the terms of an agreement for cooperation arranged pursuant to section 2153 of this title, utilization or production facilities for industrial or commercial purposes. Such licenses shall be issued in accordance with the provisions of subchapter XV and subject to such conditions as the

  11. Section 50.54 - Conditions of licenses

    10 C.F.R. § 50.54   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses

    The following paragraphs of this section, with the exception of paragraphs (r) and (gg), and the applicable requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a , are conditions in every nuclear power reactor operating license issued under this part. The following paragraphs with the exception of paragraph (r), (s), and (u) of this section are conditions in every combined license issued under part 52 of this chapter, provided, however, that paragraphs (i) introductory text, (i)(1), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), (w), (x), (y)

  12. Appendix A to Part 100 - Seismic and Geologic Siting Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants

    10 C.F.R. § 100 app A to Part 100   Cited 8 times   3 Legal Analyses

    i. purpose General Design Criterion 2 of Appendix A to part 50 of this chapter requires that nuclear power plant structures, systems, and components important to safety be designed to withstand the effects of natural phenomena such as earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, tsunami, and seiches without loss of capability to perform their safety functions. It is the purpose of these criteria to set forth the principal seismic and geologic considerations which guide the Commission in its evaluation

  13. Section 20.1401 - General provisions and scope

    10 C.F.R. § 20.1401   Cited 4 times

    (a) The criteria in this subpart apply to the decommissioning of facilities licensed under parts 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 61, 63, 70, and 72 of this chapter, and release of part of a facility or site for unrestricted use in accordance with § 50.83 of this chapter, as well as other facilities subject to the Commission's jurisdiction under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended. For high-level and low-level waste disposal facilities (10 CFR parts

  14. Section 54.21 - Contents of application-technical information

    10 C.F.R. § 54.21   Cited 1 times

    Each application must contain the following information: (a)An integrated plant assessment (IPA). The IPA must- (1) For those systems, structures, and components within the scope of this part, as delineated in § 54.4 , identify and list those structures and components subject to an aging management review. Structures and components subject to an aging management review shall encompass those structures and components- (i) That perform an intended function, as described in § 54.4 , without moving parts

  15. Section 20.1501 - General

    10 C.F.R. § 20.1501   Cited 1 times

    (a) Each licensee shall make or cause to be made, surveys of areas, including the subsurface, that- (1) May be necessary for the licensee to comply with the regulations in this part; and (2) Are reasonable under the circumstances to evaluate- (i) The magnitude and extent of radiation levels; and (ii) Concentrations or quantities of residual radioactivity; and (iii) The potential radiological hazards of the radiation levels and residual radioactivity detected. (b) Notwithstanding § 20.2103(a) of this

  16. Section 20.1406 - Minimization of contamination

    10 C.F.R. § 20.1406

    (a) Applicants for licenses, other than early site permits and manufacturing licenses under part 52 of this chapter and renewals, whose applications are submitted after August 20, 1997, shall describe in the application how facility design and procedures for operation will minimize, to the extent practicable, contamination of the facility and the environment, facilitate eventual decommissioning, and minimize, to the extent practicable, the generation of radioactive waste. (b) Applicants for standard

  17. Section 50.69 - Risk-informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems and components for nuclear power reactors

    10 C.F.R. § 50.69

    (a)Definitions. Risk-Informed Safety Class (RISC)-1 structures, systems, and components (SSCs) means safety-related SSCs that perform safety significant functions. Risk-Informed Safety Class (RISC)-2 structures, systems and components (SSCs) means nonsafety-related SSCs that perform safety significant functions. Risk-Informed Safety Class (RISC)-3 structures, systems and components (SSCs) means safety-related SSCs that perform low safety significant functions. Risk-Informed Safety Class (RISC)-4

  18. Section 50.36 - Technical specifications

    10 C.F.R. § 50.36

    (a) (1) Each applicant for a license authorizing operation of a production or utilization facility shall include in his application proposed technical specifications in accordance with the requirements of this section. A summary statement of the bases or reasons for such specifications, other than those covering administrative controls, shall also be included in the application, but shall not become part of the technical specifications. (2) Each applicant for a design certification or manufacturing