§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Cristian Morales, Appellant.

Brief

40 Cited authorities

  1. Leocal v. Ashcroft

    543 U.S. 1 (2004)   Cited 1,153 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "DUI causing serious bodily injury" is not a "crime of violence"

  2. People v. Stultz

    2 N.Y.3d 277 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 3,232 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a defendant's showing of prejudice [to be] a significant but not indispensable element in assessing meaningful representation," focusing instead on "the fairness of the proceedings as a whole"

  3. People v. Syville

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7249 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 298 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting coram nobis relief

  4. People v. Anderson

    66 N.Y.2d 529 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 380 times
    Stating that C.P.L. § 30.30, setting forth time limitations in which People must be ready for trial, addresses only problem of prosecutorial readiness, and is not a "Speedy Trial" statute in the constitutional sense

  5. Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder

    558 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 187 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chevron deference applies to published decisions but Skidmore deference applies to unpublished decisions

  6. U.S. v. Rosenbaum-Alanis

    483 F.3d 381 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 149 times
    Finding that a challenge to a sentence was moot because the inadmissible defendant completed his term of imprisonment and was deported

  7. People v. Suber

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3573 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 69 times
    In People v. Suber, 19 NY3d 247, 252, 946 N.Y.S.2d 552 (2012), the Court of Appeals held that “CPL Sec. 100.40(1) does not mandate corroboration of an admission in an information.

  8. Dalton v. Ashcroft

    257 F.3d 200 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 92 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that DWI conviction in New York is not a removable offense

  9. People v. Cooper

    98 N.Y.2d 541 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 84 times
    In Cooper, the Court of Appeals examined the exceptions listed in CPL 30.30 (5) "which require a deviation from the general rule and effectively alters the date a criminal action is deemed to have commenced for purposes of applying the CPL 30.30 (1) time frames."

  10. People v. DeLee

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8212 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 54 times

    11-24-2014 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Dwight R. DeLEE, Respondent. William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of counsel), for appellant. Philip Rothschild, Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse, for respondent. Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., New York City (Thomas W. Ude, Jr., and M. Dru Levasseur of counsel), and Nancy Hoppock, Center on the Administration of Criminal Law at New York University's School of Law, New York City, for Lambda

  11. Section 1326 - Reentry of removed aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1326   Cited 31,012 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Defining offense elements

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,708 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"