§Why CasetextPricing

Creative Artists Agency LLC v. Rodriguez et al

MOTION for Attorney Fees

12 Cited authorities

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hosp

    147 Ariz. 370 (Ariz. 1985)   Cited 504 times
    Holding that at-will employees may be fired for good cause or for no cause, but not for bad cause

  2. Associated Indem. Corp. v. Warner

    143 Ariz. 567 (Ariz. 1985)   Cited 509 times
    Holding that "the statutory language is permissible," and a court is not required to "grant attorney's fees to the prevailing party in all contested contract actions"

  3. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.

    138 Ariz. 183 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 349 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that there is sufficient detail in a billing report if counsel indicates "the type of legal services provided, the date the service was provided, the attorney providing the service . . . and the time spent in providing the service"

  4. Fulton Homes Corp. v. BBP Concrete

    214 Ariz. 566 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that third-party defendants are entitled to an award of attorneys' fees where defendants succeeded in "establishing a 'just defense'" leading to the stipulated dismissal of the claims against them

  5. Sanborn v. Brooker Wake Property Mgt.

    178 Ariz. 425 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that treble damages should not be awarded under the Arizona wage statute where the amount of wages owed was not ascertainable at the time of discharge

  6. Rudinsky v. Harris

    231 Ariz. 95 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an award of attorney’s fees on a breach of contract claim was not premature even though a defamation claim was still pending

  7. Vicari v. Lake Havasu City

    222 Ariz. 218 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 32 times
    Finding that voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 did not preclude a § 12-341.01 fee award

  8. Britt v. Steffen

    220 Ariz. 265 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 32 times
    Holding defendant could be “successful” when complaint was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute

  9. Med. Protective Co. v. Pang

    740 F.3d 1279 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that because the plaintiff's "postjudgment motion was part of an action arising out of contract," the defendant "may be eligible for an award of attorney's fees for successfully defending against that motion"

  10. Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors

    223 Ariz. 27 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that ROC disciplinary action against contractor did not arise out of contract under A.R.S. § 12-341.01

  11. Section 12-341.01 - Recovery of attorney fees

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341.01   Cited 2,621 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Permitting an award of reasonable attorney's fees to the successful party in a contested action arising out of express or implied contract