67 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,111 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. O'Shea v. Littleton

    414 U.S. 488 (1974)   Cited 4,082 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[p]ast exposure to illegal conduct does not in itself show a present case or controversy regarding injunctive relief ... if unaccompanied by any continuing, present adverse effects"
  3. Manzarek v. Marine

    519 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 2,712 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in evaluating a complaint on a motion to dismiss, the court “accept factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
  4. Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman

    51 Cal.4th 811 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,266 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an attorney "may not do anything which will injuriously affect former client in any matter in which [the attorney] formerly represented [the client]"
  5. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,654 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  6. Waller v. Truck Ins. Exchange, Inc.

    11 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 1,748 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, when extrinsic facts eliminate the potential for coverage, an insurer may decline to defend even if the complaint had suggested potential liability
  7. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.

    44 Cal.3d 1103 (Cal. 1988)   Cited 997 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff who suspects wrongdoing but is unaware of any specific facts establishing wrongful conduct on the part of the defendant, may not delay bringing an action until she discovers such facts or their legal significance
  8. Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

    364 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 571 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant movie theater must ensure that wheelchair accessible seats and companion seats, which are required under § 221 of the 2010 Standards, are actually available for wheelchair customers and their companions
  9. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.

    23 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 555 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding restitution is "the return of the excess of what the plaintiff gave the defendant over the value of what the plaintiff received"
  10. Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co.

    42 Cal.4th 713 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 436 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that insured had raised triable issue of fact as to whether insurer breached the covenant of good faith by failing to investigate insured's claim, where insured had presented medical evidence of degenerative spine disease resulting from trauma, and the insurer denied the claim without conducting any investigation on the basis of the unfounded opinion that the insured suffered from a preexisting degenerative disorder
  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,827 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  12. Section 17203 - Injunctive relief

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17203   Cited 984 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an individual plead that she lost "money or property" because of the alleged deceptive conduct
  13. Section 1550 - Essential to existence of contract

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1550   Cited 844 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the "essential" elements of contract formation include mutual consent and sufficient consideration
  14. Section 790.03 - Unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts

    Cal. Ins. Code § 790.03   Cited 591 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Requiring differentials based on the sex of the individual insured
  15. Section 1580 - Mutual consent

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1580   Cited 214 times

    Consent is not mutual, unless the parties all agree upon the same thing in the same sense. But in certain cases defined by the Chapter on Interpretation, they are to be deemed so to agree without regard to the fact. Ca. Civ. Code § 1580 Enacted 1872.