§Why CasetextPricing

TOTAL E&P USA, Inc. v. Marubeni Oil & Gas (USA), Inc.

RESPONSE in Opposition to 93 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses, 94 Sealed Event

9 Cited authorities

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders

    437 U.S. 340 (1978)   Cited 4,393 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."

  2. Alpine View Co. v. Atlas Copco AB

    205 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 2000)   Cited 697 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that general jurisdiction did not exist where the defendant occasionally sold products to entities in Texas that used the defendant's products for projects in Texas and the defendant's employees made field visits to Texas between December 1992 and December 1993

  3. Har-Mar Collisions, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

    212 So. 3d 892 (Ala. 2016)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that a similar setoff was improper where the two insurers owed "separate and distinct" obligations to the insured

  4. Tidelands Royalty B Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.

    804 F.2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1987)   Cited 18 times
    Stating that purchasing a royalty is a "gamble"

  5. Weaver v. Florida Exploration Co.

    608 So. 2d 1034 (La. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 2 times
    Stating that a party was not entitled to damages for the royalty interest that was "without proof and . . . speculative and ha[d] not been proven with reasonable certainty"

  6. Norsul Oil Min. Co., Ltd. v. Texaco, Inc.

    703 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D. Fla. 1988)   Cited 3 times

    No. 76-1629-CIV. December 15, 1988. Claude H. Tison, Jr., MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. Kelley, Drye Warren including Smathers Thompson, Miami, Fla., Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays Handler, New York City, for defendants. Lawrence R. Jerz, White Plains, N.Y., for defendants Texaco Inc. and Texaco Petroleum Co. MEMORANDUM OPINION HOEVELER, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court for trial without a jury on January 19, 1988. The trial was concluded on February

  7. Spiner v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

    94 F. Supp. 273 (W.D. La. 1950)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. A. No. 2987. December 6, 1950. Irwin I. Muslow, Shreveport, La., for plaintiff. Jackson, Mayer Kennedy, Shreveport, La., for Phillips McGee. Paul R. Mayer, Shreveport, La., for Mitchells. PORTERIE, District Judge. Judgment on motions to dismiss for lack of grounds to justify relief, filed by (a) Phillips Petroleum Company and Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc., and by (b) Howard and Minerva Mitchell. Howard Mitchell, husband of Minerva Mitchell, both defendants herein, owns the following described

  8. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,775 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,025 times   653 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37