§Why CasetextPricing

TOTAL E&P USA, Inc. v. Marubeni Oil & Gas (USA), Inc.

REPLY to Response to 231 MOTION for Attorney Fees, 234 Corrected MOTION for Prejudgment and Post-Judgment Interest

1 Cited authority

  1. Perdue v. Kenny A.

    559 U.S. 542 (2010)   Cited 2,468 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that enhancement is permitted only in "rare circumstances in which the lodestar does not adequately take into account a factor that may properly be considered"