Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council
467 U.S. 837 (1984) Cited 16,016 times 500 Legal AnalysesHolding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.
519 U.S. 337 (1997) Cited 2,470 times 16 Legal AnalysesHolding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII
Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
839 F.3d 958 (11th Cir. 2016) Cited 124 times 5 Legal AnalysesFinding that Griggs addressed only "promotion and transfer policies"
Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss
351 F.3d 183 (5th Cir. 2003) Cited 166 timesApplying same standard for age discrimination claim
Kleber v. Carefusion Corp.
914 F.3d 480 (7th Cir. 2019) Cited 12 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that ADEA's disparate impact provision does not apply to outside job applicants
Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Thelaw.net Corporation
269 F. Supp. 2d 942 (S.D. Ohio 2003) Cited 26 timesIdentifying four elements of claim under Ohio law
Rabin v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
236 F. Supp. 3d 1126 (N.D. Cal. 2017) Cited 3 times 1 Legal AnalysesAgreeing with Villarreal dissent and denying judgment on pleadings on disparate impact claim by putative class of outside job applicants
Section 623 - Prohibition of age discrimination
29 U.S.C. § 623 Cited 10,073 times 51 Legal AnalysesHolding that under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against individuals who are at least forty years of age