§Why CasetextPricing

The People of the State of New York by Eric T. Schneiderman,, Respondent,v.Maurice R. Greenberg, et al., Appellants.

Brief

125 Cited authorities

  1. Felker v. Turpin

    518 U.S. 651 (1996)   Cited 3,105 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's "restrictions . . . on second habeas petitions are well within the compass of [habeas's] evolutionary process, and . . . do not amount to a 'suspension' of the writ"

  2. Vega v. Restani Constr. Corp.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1148 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 2,797 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming denial of summary judgment

  3. Merrill v. Dabit

    547 U.S. 71 (2006)   Cited 668 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law class action securities fraud claims brought by “holders” of securities are, just like those of “purchasers” and “sellers,” preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act

  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores

    421 U.S. 723 (1975)   Cited 2,070 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that only purchasers and sellers of a security have a private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b–5

  5. Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.

    527 U.S. 308 (1999)   Cited 777 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preliminary injunctive relief freezing defendants' assets was not warranted because injunctive relief was historically unavailable where plaintiff sought only money damages for breach of contract

  6. Leroy v. Great W. United Corp.

    443 U.S. 173 (1979)   Cited 962 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while “[t]he question of personal jurisdiction, which goes to the court's power to exercise control over the parties, is typically decided in advance of venue, ... a court may reverse the normal order of considering personal jurisdiction and venue”

  7. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

    516 U.S. 479 (1996)   Cited 494 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding citizens cannot recover costs for past cleanup efforts under RCRA

  8. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.

    345 U.S. 629 (1953)   Cited 2,220 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, although defendant had "disclaimed any intention" to revive the challenged conduct, "[s]uch a profession does not suffice to make a case moot although it is one of the factors to be considered in determining the appropriateness of granting an injunction against the now-discontinued acts"

  9. Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.

    937 F.2d 767 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,986 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court may consider matters of which judicial notice may be taken under Federal Rule of Evidence 201

  10. Miss. ex rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp.

    571 U.S. 161 (2014)   Cited 214 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the ‘100 or more persons’ referred to in the statute are ... the very ‘plaintiffs’ referred to later in the sentence" and that the word "plaintiffs" means "the actual named parties who bring an action"

  11. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,056 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"

  12. Section 78a - Short title

    15 U.S.C. § 78a   Cited 1,721 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Emphasizing considerations of federalism in SLUSA's legislative findings

  13. Section 77t - Injunctions and prosecution of offenses

    15 U.S.C. § 77t   Cited 1,404 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting the SEC the power to seek civil penalties for violations of the Securities Act

  14. Section 78bb - Effect on existing law

    15 U.S.C. § 78bb   Cited 906 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting definition of "covered security" found in paragraphs and of section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933

  15. Section 77p - Additional remedies; limitation on remedies

    15 U.S.C. § 77p   Cited 449 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing certain securities class actions to be removed to federal court

  16. Section 77r - Exemption from State regulation of securities offerings

    15 U.S.C. § 77r   Cited 201 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing state authority to regulate offerings of securities that are completely intra-state

  17. Section 229.401 - (Item 401) Directors, executive officers, promoters and control persons

    17 C.F.R. § 229.401   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Instructing registrant to disclose federal bankruptcy petitions of director or executive officer in previous five years where "material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity" of such director or officer