§Why CasetextPricing

The People of the State of New York by Eric T. Schneiderman,, Respondent,v.Maurice R. Greenberg, et al., Appellants.

Brief

129 Cited authorities

  1. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell

    538 U.S. 408 (2003)   Cited 2,672 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an award of $145 million in punitive damages on a $1 million compensatory verdict violated due process

  2. Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp

    68 N.Y.2d 320 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 21,211 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Finding summary judgment appropriate by relying on a treating doctor's unrebutted deposition testimony

  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co.

    339 U.S. 306 (1950)   Cited 10,304 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"

  4. Merrill v. Dabit

    547 U.S. 71 (2006)   Cited 668 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law class action securities fraud claims brought by “holders” of securities are, just like those of “purchasers” and “sellers,” preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act

  5. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Labs

    471 U.S. 707 (1985)   Cited 1,191 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding local health ordinance not preempted because "the regulation of health and safety matters is primarily, and historically, a matter of local concern"

  6. Tull v. United States

    481 U.S. 412 (1987)   Cited 1,014 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party had a right to trial by jury in civil claims brought by the government

  7. Gabelli v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n

    568 U.S. 442 (2013)   Cited 316 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statute of limitations for SEC enforcement actions begins when fraudulent action occurs

  8. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

    516 U.S. 479 (1996)   Cited 494 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding citizens cannot recover costs for past cleanup efforts under RCRA

  9. Andre v. Pomeroy

    35 N.Y.2d 361 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 3,177 times
    Granting summary judgment to plaintiff in case in which defendant admitted that while driving in heavy traffic she took her eyes off the road to look for something in her purse and drove into the car in front of her

  10. Alfred L. Snapp Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico

    458 U.S. 592 (1982)   Cited 537 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state has a legally protectable interest in enforcing its legal code

  11. Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

    15 U.S.C. § 78j   Cited 12,502 times   165 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities

  12. Section 77q - Fraudulent interstate transactions

    15 U.S.C. § 77q   Cited 3,299 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the use of "any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud" in connection with the offer or sale of any security

  13. Section 78u - Investigations and actions

    15 U.S.C. § 78u   Cited 2,256 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Granting the SEC the power to seek civil penalties for violations of the Exchange Act

  14. Section 77t - Injunctions and prosecution of offenses

    15 U.S.C. § 77t   Cited 1,408 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting the SEC the power to seek civil penalties for violations of the Securities Act

  15. Section 78bb - Effect on existing law

    15 U.S.C. § 78bb   Cited 906 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting definition of "covered security" found in paragraphs and of section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933

  16. Section 63 - General duties

    N.Y. Exec. Law § 63   Cited 768 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Specifying that in such circumstances the Attorney General or her deputy will exercise the powers the district attorney “would otherwise” hold, and the district attorney is limited to “exercise[ing] such powers . . . as are required of him by the attorney-general or the deputy attorney-general so attending”

  17. Section 77p - Additional remedies; limitation on remedies

    15 U.S.C. § 77p   Cited 449 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing certain securities class actions to be removed to federal court

  18. Section 78u-6 - Securities whistleblower incentives and protection

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-6   Cited 270 times   204 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC "authority to issue such rules and regulations as may be necessary and appropriate to implement the provisions" establishing whistleblower award program

  19. Section 77r - Exemption from State regulation of securities offerings

    15 U.S.C. § 77r   Cited 201 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing state authority to regulate offerings of securities that are completely intra-state

  20. Section 7243 - Forfeiture of certain bonuses and profits

    15 U.S.C. § 7243   Cited 70 times   8 Legal Analyses

    (a) Additional compensation prior to noncompliance with Commission financial reporting requirements If an issuer is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the issuer, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the issuer shall reimburse the issuer for- (1) any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation received by that person from

  21. Section 240.10b-5 - Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices

    17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5   Cited 9,196 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "make any untrue statement of material fact"