72 Cited authorities

  1. Vasquez v. Hillery

    474 U.S. 254 (1986)   Cited 1,931 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a judge's systemic exclusion of racial minorities from the grand jury compelled the dismissal of the indictment
  2. Mich. v. Bay Mills Indian Cmty.

    572 U.S. 782 (2014)   Cited 457 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that tribal immunity extends to "suits arising from a tribe’s commercial activities, even when they take place off Indian lands"
  3. INS v. Lopez-Mendoza

    468 U.S. 1032 (1984)   Cited 987 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "deportation is not to punish past transgressions but rather to put an end to a continuing violation of the immigration laws."
  4. People v. Bing

    76 N.Y.2d 331 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 313 times
    In Bing, the New York Court of Appeals held that a criminal defendant, who had been represented by counsel on prior pending unrelated charges, was not deprived of the right to counsel under the State Constitution where, in the absence of counsel, the defendant waived his or her Miranda rights and made statements in response to police questioning on matters unrelated to the prior pending charge.
  5. U.S. v. Sawyer

    85 F.3d 713 (1st Cir. 1996)   Cited 122 times
    Holding that a conviction of a public official for honest services wire fraud "cannot stand where the conduct does not actually deprive the public of its right to her honest services" and where the official through her conduct "is not shown to intend that [deprivation]"
  6. Reynolds v. United States

    98 U.S. 145 (1878)   Cited 1,286 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the forfeiture doctrine requires a witness to be “absent by his [i.e., defendant's] own wrongful procurement”
  7. Rajah v. Mukasey

    544 F.3d 427 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 65 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding seven hours of questioning, with two stints in jail cell, was "long and tiresome" but not shocking
  8. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District

    (N.Y. May. 12, 1998)   Cited 77 times
    In Majewski the New York Court of Appeals observed that "the date that legislation is to take effect is a separate question from whether the statute should apply to claims and rights then in existence."
  9. Bourquin v. Cuomo

    85 N.Y.2d 781 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that inferences should not be drawn from legislative inaction
  10. Roschen v. Ward

    279 U.S. 337 (1929)   Cited 165 times
    Upholding as constitutional, without reference to any specific constitutional clause, a New York statute making it unlawful for opticians to sell eyeglasses at retail in any store, unless a duly licensed optometrist or physician was in charge and personally in attendance
  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 42,962 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"
  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,843 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,983 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  14. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,874 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists
  15. Section 1427 - Requirements of naturalization

    8 U.S.C. § 1427   Cited 946 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an applicant for naturalization have good moral character
  16. Section 1421 - Naturalization authority

    8 U.S.C. § 1421   Cited 940 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts the authority to conduct de novo review of denials of applications for naturalization
  17. Section 1186a - Conditional permanent resident status for certain alien spouses and sons and daughters

    8 U.S.C. § 1186a   Cited 373 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing for hardship waivers for "for an alien who fails to meet the requirements of paragraph"
  18. Section 285 - Incest

    Cal. Pen. Code § 285   Cited 233 times

    Persons being within the degrees of consanguinity within which marriages are declared by law to be incestuous and void, who intermarry with each other, or who being 14 years of age or older, commit fornication or adultery with each other, are punishable by imprisonment in the state prison. Ca. Pen. Code § 285 Amended by Stats 2005 ch 477 (SB 33),s 1, eff. 1/1/2006

  19. Section 4302 - Incest

    18 Pa. C.S. § 4302   Cited 191 times
    Relating to incest
  20. Section 568.020 - Incest - penalty

    Mo. Rev. Stat. § 568.020   Cited 62 times

    1. A person commits the offense of incest if he or she marries or purports to marry or engages in sexual intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse with a person he or she knows to be, without regard to legitimacy, his or her: (1) Ancestor or descendant by blood or adoption; or (2) Stepchild, while the marriage creating that relationship exists; or (3) Brother or sister of the whole or half-blood; or (4) Uncle, aunt, nephew or niece of the whole blood. 2. The offense of incest is a class E felony