30 Cited authorities

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mut

    49 N.Y.2d 451 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 589 times
    In Kurcsics, the court construed the phrase "first party benefits", contained in section 671 of the Insurance Law, as it related to no-fault insurance protection.
  2. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 370 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  3. Raritan Development Corp. v. Silva

    91 N.Y.2d 98 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 177 times
    In Raritan, the "BSA's interpretation [of the Zoning Resolution] conflict[ed] with the plain statutory language" and, thus, the Court of Appeals found that the BSA' s interpretation could not be sustained (Raritan, 91 N.Y.2d at 103).
  4. Tall Trees Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    761 N.E.2d 565 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Tall Trees Construction Corp., though, the court held that because the Board did not have to make any findings of fact, the court's appellate review was not limited to such findings when deciding whether the procedural dismissal was arbitrary or capricious. Tall Trees Construction Corp., 761 N.E.2d at 570.
  5. Matter of Albano v. Kirby

    36 N.Y.2d 526 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 219 times

    Argued March 19, 1975 Decided May 7, 1975 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH LIFF, J. Frederick Fagelson for appellant. George W. Percy, Jr., County Attorney (Patrick A. Sweeney of counsel), for respondents. COOKE, J. We review here the discharge of a social services investigator at the end of his 16th week of service, following his appointment from a competitive civil service list for a probationary term of 26 weeks, under county civil

  6. Doctors Council v. Nycers

    71 N.Y.2d 669 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 143 times

    Argued April 21, 1988 Decided May 31, 1988 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Arthur E. Blyn, J. Richard M. Betheil and Ronald H. Schechtman for appellants. Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Barry P. Schwartz and Fay Leoussis of counsel), for respondents. Robert Perez-Wilson and Joel Giller for Stanley Hill, amicus curiae. BELLACOSA, J. We agree with the views expressed in the dissent at the Appellate Division that the pertinent statute

  7. Trump-Equitable v. Gliedman

    57 N.Y.2d 588 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 151 times

    Argued November 10, 1982 Decided December 14, 1982 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, FRANK J. BLANGIARDO, J. Milton S. Gould and Roy M. Cohn for appellant. Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr. ( Edith I. Spivack and Rochelle M. Corson of counsel), for respondent. WACHTLER, J. The Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Company (Trump), which seeks a partial tax exemption in this proceeding, is a joint venture which owns a parcel of real property located at 721-725

  8. Rangolan v. County of Nassau

    749 N.E.2d 178 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 87 times
    In Rangolan v. County of Nassau (96 NY2d 42), this Court held that CPLR 1602 (2) (iv) did not preclude apportionment when a defendant's liability arose from a nondelegable duty because the subsection was a savings provision and not an exception.
  9. In the Matter of Orens v. Novello

    99 N.Y.2d 180 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 69 times
    Relying on Merriam–Webster's Collegiate Dictionary and Black's Law Dictionary in determining meaning of term “lay member”
  10. Lantry v. State

    2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 9573 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 60 times
    In Lantry v. State of New York, 6 NY3d 49 (2005), the Court of Appeals outlined the procedure whereby the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor sets the prevailing rate for workers on State and local public works projects (except in New York City, where it is the responsibility of the Comptroller). First, the Commissioner (here, Comptroller) classifies the work to a specific trade or occupation. Second, the Commissioner (here, Comptroller) "must ascertain the prevailing rate for that trade or occupation in the relevant locality."
  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 9,882 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  12. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 6,756 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB
  13. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,112 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials
  14. s 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review