37 Cited authorities

  1. Euclid v. Ambler Co.

    272 U.S. 365 (1926)   Cited 2,413 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a zoning ordinance that "greatly ... reduce[d] the value of appellee's lands and destroy[ed] their marketability for industrial, commercial and residential uses" constituted a "present invasion of appellee's property rights"
  2. Robinson Twp. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'n

    83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013)   Cited 164 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "explicit terms of the trust require the government to ‘conserve and maintain’ the corpus of the trust"
  3. Gernatt Asphalt v. Sardinia

    87 N.Y.2d 668 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 266 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In Gernatt —decided after the legislature had codified Frew Run's holding in an amendment to the MLRL's supersession clause—the Town of Sardinia amended its zoning ordinance to eliminate all mining as a permitted use throughout the town.
  4. DJL Restaurant Corp. v. City of New York

    96 N.Y.2d 91 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 94 times
    Finding separate levels of oversight can coexist when the impact is tangential
  5. Udell v. Haas

    21 N.Y.2d 463 (N.Y. 1968)   Cited 130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Udell v. Haas (21 N.Y.2d 463, 468-469) the court observed, "In our view, sound zoning principles were not followed in this case, and the root cause of this failure was a misunderstanding of the nature of zoning, and, even more importantly, of its relationship to the statutory requirement that it be `in accordance with a comprehensive plan'."
  6. United States v. Town of Dryden (In re Norse Energy Corp.)

    108 A.D.3d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 20 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York state law did not preempt municipal ordinance banning hydrocarbon extraction activities
  7. Wal-Mart v. Planning Bd.

    238 A.D.2d 93 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 35 times

    February 5, 1998 Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart Rhodes, Lake Placid ( Thomas A. Ulasewicz of counsel), for petitioners. Shanley, Sweeney, Reilly Allen, P. C., Albany ( J. Michael Naughton of counsel), for respondent. YESAWICH JR., J. In October 1994, petitioner Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner) applied to respondent for a conditional use permit and site plan approval for a large retail store it proposed to construct and operate in the Town of North Elba, Essex County ( see, Matter of Wal-Mart

  8. Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden

    35 Misc. 3d 450 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2012-02-21 ANSCHUTZ EXPLORATION CORPORATION, Petitioner, Plaintiff,For a Judgment Pursuant to Articles 78 and 3001 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, v. TOWN OF DRYDEN and Town of Dryden Town Board, Respondents, Defendants. The West Firm, PLLC, by Thomas S. West, Esq., Yvonne E. Hennessey, Esq., Albany, Attorneys for Petitioner–Plaintiff, Anschutz Exploration Corp. Mahlon R. Perkins, P.C. by Mahlon R. Perkins, Esq., Dryden, Attorney for Respondents–Defendants, Town of Dryden and Town of Dryden

  9. Matter of Schadow v. Wilson

    191 A.D.2d 53 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 14 times

    July 1, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Saratoga County, Dominick J. Viscardi, J. David W. Little, Burnt Hills, for appellants. Desmond Holsberger, Scotia (John L. Desmond of counsel), for respondent. CASEY, J. Pursuant to the Town of Ballston Zoning Law, soil mining is designated as a permissible use and may be allowed by special use permit granted by respondents. To be entitled to a special use permit, the applicant must meet the four standards or guidelines set forth in Town of Ballston Zoning

  10. Matter of Pete Drown v. Town Board

    188 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 10 times

    December 17, 1992 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County (Ryan, Jr., J.). Mikoll, J.P. In November 1989 petitioner Pete Drown, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner) contacted respondent concerning the establishment of a medical waste incinerator in the Town of Ellenburg, Clinton County. On December 11, 1989 respondent passed a resolution (Resolution No. 36) by unanimous vote opposing the plan and instructed the Town Attorney to research and draft a local law or ordinance regulating dumping in the

  11. Section 10 - General powers of local governments to adopt and amend local laws

    N.Y. Mun. Home Rule Law § 10   Cited 823 times
    Enumerating powers and limits of local government
  12. Section 267 - Zoning board of appeals

    N.Y. Town Law § 267   Cited 279 times
    Mandating that "[e]ach town board which adopts a [zoning law or ordinance] . . . shall appoint a board of appeals"
  13. Section 274-A - Site plan review

    N.Y. Town Law § 274-A   Cited 152 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Zoning and planning; site plan review
  14. Section 267-A - Board of appeals procedure

    N.Y. Town Law § 267-A   Cited 127 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the filing of all orders, requirements, decisions, etc. of the local zoning administrator for appeal purposes
  15. Section 20 - Grant of specific powers

    N.Y. Gen. City Law § 20   Cited 113 times

    Subject to the constitution and general laws of this state, every city is empowered: 1. To contract and be contracted with and to institute, maintain and defend any action or proceeding in any court. 2. To take, purchase, hold and lease real and personal property within and without the limits of the city; to acquire pursuant to the provisions of the eminent domain procedure law, real property within or without the limits of the city for the construction, maintenance and operation of a sewage disposal

  16. Section 263 - Purposes in view

    N.Y. Town Law § 263   Cited 98 times
    Listing the purposes of zoning
  17. Section 277 - Subdivision review; approval of plats; additional requisites

    N.Y. Town Law § 277   Cited 81 times

    1. Purpose. Before the approval by the planning board of a plat showing lots, blocks or sites, with or without streets or highways, or the approval of a plat already filed in the office of the clerk of the county wherein such plat is situated if the plat is entirely or partially undeveloped, the planning board shall require that the land shown on the plat be of such character that it can be used safely for building purposes without danger to health or peril from fire, flood, drainage or other menace

  18. Section 272-A - Town comprehensive plan

    N.Y. Town Law § 272-A   Cited 79 times

    1. Legislative findings and intent. The legislature hereby finds and determines that: (a) Significant decisions and actions affecting the immediate and long-range protection, enhancement, growth and development of the state and its communities are made by local governments. (b) Among the most important powers and duties granted by the legislature to a town government is the authority and responsibility to undertake town comprehensive planning and to regulate land use for the purpose of protecting

  19. Section 81-B - Permitted action by board of appeals

    N.Y. Gen. City Law § 81-B   Cited 63 times

    1. Definitions. As used in this section: (a) "Use variance" shall mean the authorization by the zoning board of appeals for the use of land for a purpose which is otherwise not allowed or is prohibited by the applicable zoning regulations. (b) "Area variance" shall mean the authorization by the zoning board of appeals for the use of land in a manner which is not allowed by the dimensional or physical requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. 2. Orders, requirements, decisions, interpretations

  20. Section 274-B - Approval of special use permits

    N.Y. Town Law § 274-B   Cited 55 times

    1. Definition of special use permit. As used in this section the term "special use permit" shall mean an authorization of a particular land use which is permitted in a zoning ordinance or local law, subject to requirements imposed by such zoning ordinance or local law to assure that the proposed use is in harmony with such zoning ordinance or local law and will not adversely affect the neighborhood if such requirements are met. 2. Approval of special use permits. The town board may, as part of a

  21. Section 553.3 - Spacing units

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 553.3

    (a) To promote effective development, use, or conservation of the natural resources of oil and gas, an order establishing well spacing may be promulgated by the department. (b) Prior to promulgation of any spacing order, a public hearing on the matter will be conducted by the department acting either on its own motion or upon receipt of an application therefor from any interested owner or operator. (c) Any application for a spacing order shall be made in writing and should include any information

  22. Section 553.2 - Surface restrictions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 553.2

    No well shall be located nearer than 100 feet from any inhabited private dwelling house without written consent of the owner; nearer than 150 feet from any public building or area which may be used as a place of resort, assembly, education, entertainment, lodging, trade, manufacture, repair, storage, traffic or occupancy by the public; nearer than 75 feet to the traveled part of any State, county, township, or municipal road or any public street, road or highway; or nearer than 50 feet from any public