21 Cited authorities

  1. Zuckerman v. City of N.Y.

    49 N.Y.2d 557 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 24,815 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Granting summary judgment as the city's arguments were considered speculation and this was "patently inadequate to establish the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial . . ."
  2. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox

    3 N.Y.2d 395 (N.Y. 1957)   Cited 5,995 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that provision prohibited assignments when the provision stated, in part, that "neither party hereto shall assign this agreement . . . without the prior written consent of the other party," and "that [defendant] shall not be required to recognize any assignments; and that if [defendant] shall receive notice of the existence of any assignment, it shall have the right to withhold payments until the assignment is cancelled or withdrawn"
  3. Kolivas v. Kirchoff

    14 A.D.3d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 632 times

    2003-08729 January 10, 2005. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Maureen D. Kirchoff and Francis A. Kirchoff appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated July 7, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Rivera, JJ. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs. Summary judgment is

  4. Barbieri v. Vokoun

    72 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 105 times
    In Barbieri v Vokoun (72 AD3d 853 [2d Dept 2010]), the Second Department held, in a similar case involving a driver colliding into a pedestrian with the right of way at a crosswalk, that a violation of a standard of care imposed by the Vehicle and Traffic Law constitutes negligence per se, citing to Coogan v Torrisi, 47 AD3d 669, 670 [2d Dept 2008] ; Jones v Radeker, 32 AD3d 494, 496 [2d Dept 2006] ; and Lagana v Fox, 6 AD3d 583 [2d Dept 2004]).
  5. Thoma v. Ronai

    82 N.Y.2d 736 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 134 times
    In Thoma, the plaintiff was crossing East 79th Street along the west side of First Avenue, with the walk signal in her favor, when she was hit while in the crosswalk by a van that had been driving northbound on First Avenue, which made a left turn onto East 79th Street heading westbound.
  6. Garcia v. Lenox Hill Florist III, Inc.

    120 A.D.3d 1296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 40 times
    In Garcia v. Lenox Hill Florist III, Inc., 120 A.D.3d 1296, 993 N.Y.S.2d 86 [2d Dept. 2014], the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that the plaintiff established entitled to judgment as a matter of law "by presenting proof that the injured plaintiff was walking within an unmarked crosswalk and that he looked for approaching traffic before he began to cross.
  7. Ramos v. Bartis

    112 A.D.3d 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 40 times

    2013-12-18 Yolanda Abarca RAMOS, respondent, v. Lester BARTIS, et al., appellants. Martyn, Toher & Martyn, Mineola, N.Y. (Thomas M. Martyn of counsel), for appellants. Theodore A. Naima, P.C., Garden City, N.Y., for respondent. PETER B. SKELOS Martyn, Toher & Martyn, Mineola, N.Y. (Thomas M. Martyn of counsel), for appellants. Theodore A. Naima, P.C., Garden City, N.Y., for respondent. PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ. In an action, inter alia, to

  8. Rosenblatt v. Venizelos

    49 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 47 times

    No. 2007-02783. March 4, 2008. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated February 23, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants. Taller Wizman, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y. (Y. David Taller of counsel), for respondent. Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci

  9. Sulaiman v. Thomas

    54 A.D.3d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 33 times

    No. 2007-05114. September 9, 2008. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated May 4, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Leahey Johnson, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Peter James Johnson, Jr., Peter James Johnson, James P. Tenney, Joanne Filiberti, and Rosa M. Batista of counsel), for appellant. Bruce S. Reznick, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac

  10. Brown v. Mackiewicz

    120 A.D.3d 1172 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 16 times

    2014-09-10 Priscilla BROWN, appellant, v. Elizabeth MACKIEWICZ, et al., respondents. Block O'Toole & Murphy, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Scott Occhiogrosso of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Edward F.X. Hart and Marta Ross of counsel; Lauren Di Giovanni on the brief), for respondents. PETER B. SKELOS Block O'Toole & Murphy, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Scott Occhiogrosso of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Edward F

  11. Section 21-R:5 - Divisions Established

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 21-R:5

    The commissioner shall establish 4 divisions, business relationship management, user experience, infrastructure and operations, and user services, which shall be in alignment with the department's statewide strategic plan. Each division shall be under the supervision of a division director appointed pursuant to RSA 21-R:3. RSA 21-R:5 Amended by 2023, 79:1, eff. 7/1/2023. Amended by 2018 , 81: 2, eff. 5/25/2018. Amended by 2012 , 265: 1, eff. 6/18/2012. 2008, 335 : 1 , eff. Sept. 5, 2008. 2018, 81