§Why CasetextPricing

Amazon.com, LLC, et al., Appellants,v.New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, et al., Respondents.

Brief

52 Cited authorities

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

    444 U.S. 286 (1980)   Cited 11,087 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

  2. Medimmune, Inc. v. GenenTech, Inc.

    549 U.S. 118 (2007)   Cited 2,670 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"

  3. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,772 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a facial challenger "must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid"

  4. Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n

    558 U.S. 310 (2010)   Cited 1,677 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that disclaimer and disclosure requirements are subject to exacting scrutiny

  5. Wash. State Grange v. Wa. State Repub. Party

    552 U.S. 442 (2008)   Cited 1,354 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should neither "anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it" nor "formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied"

  6. Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius

    567 U.S. 519 (2012)   Cited 1,008 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was not a valid exercise of the Commerce Clause power after focusing solely on whether it regulated "economic activity" without discussing the remaining Morrison factors

  7. Chicago v. Morales

    527 U.S. 41 (1999)   Cited 1,345 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that vagueness that "fails to establish standards for the police and public that are sufficient to guard against the arbitrary deprivation of liberty interests" is subject to facial challenge

  8. Ulster County Court v. Allen

    442 U.S. 140 (1979)   Cited 1,886 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that criminal defendants could not mount a facial challenge to a statute that had been constitutionally applied at their trial

  9. Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company

    561 U.S. 477 (2010)   Cited 585 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that the dual for-cause limitations on the removal of [Public Company Accounting Oversight] Board members contravene the Constitution's separation of powers"

  10. Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood

    546 U.S. 320 (2006)   Cited 470 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lower courts should not have invalidated the entire statute, but should have accounted for the legislature's policy choices and the statute's severability clause

  11. Section 70.85 - Transitional exception to determinate sentencing laws

    N.Y. Penal Law § 70.85   Cited 139 times

    This section shall apply only to cases in which a determinate sentence was imposed between September first, nineteen hundred ninety-eight, and the effective date of this section, and was required by law to include a term of post-release supervision, but the court did not explicitly state such a term when pronouncing sentence. When such a case is again before the court pursuant to section six hundred one-d of the correction law or otherwise, for consideration of whether to resentence, the court may

  12. Section 1145 - Penalties and interest

    N.Y. Tax Law § 1145   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) (i) Any person failing to file a return or to pay or pay over any tax to the tax commission within the time required by or pursuant to this article (determined with regard to any extension of time for filing or paying) shall be subject to a penalty of ten percent of the amount of tax due if such failure is for not more than one month, with an additional one percent for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding thirty percent in the aggregate

  13. Section 12 - Internet; advertising, vendor status, nexus

    N.Y. Tax Law § 12   Cited 19 times

    (a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of this section, the term "person" shall mean a corporation, joint stock company or association, insurance corporation, or banking corporation, as such terms are defined in section one hundred eighty-three, one hundred eighty-four, or one hundred eighty-six, or in article nine-A or thirty-three of this chapter, imposing tax on such entities. (b) No person shall be subject to the taxes imposed under section one hundred eighty-three, one hundred eighty-four or one