16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.

    437 U.S. 214 (1978)   Cited 837 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a FOIA requestor's rights are neither “diminished” nor “enhanced” in light of a “particular, litigation-generated need for these materials”
  2. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn

    420 U.S. 469 (1975)   Cited 856 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a radio station could not constitutionally be held liable for broadcasting the name of a rape victim, because the victim's name was contained in public records
  3. Military Audit Project v. Casey

    656 F.2d 724 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 1,109 times
    Holding that the CIA did not waive the applicability of Exemption 1 to all classified information relating to a subject by voluntarily releasing some formerly classified information about that subject
  4. Gould v. New York City Police Department

    89 N.Y.2d 267 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 330 times
    In Gould, the FOIL petitioners, one of whom was convicted of a sex crime, sought to obtain complaint follow-up reports (DD-5's) and other records for which the police claimed a blanket "intra-agency" exemption.
  5. Wilner v. National Sec. Agency

    592 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 139 times
    Holding that similarly worded provision related to the National Security Agency falls under Exemption 3
  6. Vaughn v. Rosen

    523 F.2d 1136 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 331 times
    Holding that the agency's affidavits fail to carry its burden of proof "because at no place do they define, explain, or limit the 'deliberative process' which the Government seeks to protect
  7. Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency

    546 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 300 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding CIA refusal to confirm or deny existence of records of CIA connection to activities of ship named the Hughes Glomar Explorer
  8. Matter of Fink v. Lefkowitz

    47 N.Y.2d 567 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 272 times
    Noting that FOIL "established a general policy [in favor of] disclosure"
  9. Encore College Bookstores, Inc. v. Auxiliary Service Corp.

    87 N.Y.2d 410 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 90 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued November 28, 1995 Decided December 27, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, William P. McCooe, J. Joseph A. Faraldo, Kew Gardens, for appellant. Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn Berman, New York City (Suzanne M. Berger and James M. Altman of counsel), for Auxiliary Service Corporation of the State University of New York at Farmingdale, respondent. Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, New York City (John P. Dellera, Victoria A. Graffeo

  10. Lesher v. Hynes

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2414 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 53 times
    In Lesher, for example, the prosecutor's general explanation that the correspondence sought contained information concerning the particulars of the crime and the identities and statements of witnesses and that "its release posed an obvious risk of prematurely tipping the District Attorney's hand" was sufficient to support reliance on the exemption (id. at 67-68).
  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 10,551 times   509 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party