§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Talib W. Abdur-Rashid, Appellant,v.New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.--------------------------------In the Matter of Samir Hashmi, Appellant, v. New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.

Brief

29 Cited authorities

  1. Larson v. Department of State

    565 F.3d 857 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 598 times
    Holding that information provided by CHS that could reveal the identity of intelligence source was properly withheld

  2. Wolf v. C.I.A

    473 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 514 times
    Holding that an "official acknowledgment waiver relates only to the existence or nonexistence of the records," and remanding "to the district court where the CIA must either disclose any officially acknowledged records or establish both that their contents are exempt from disclosure and that such exemption has not also been waived"

  3. Military Audit Project v. Casey

    656 F.2d 724 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 1,215 times
    Holding that the CIA did not waive the applicability of Exemption 1 to all classified information relating to a subject by voluntarily releasing some formerly classified information about that subject

  4. Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman

    71 N.Y.2d 564 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 696 times
    Finding that the plain language of the statute authorizing a trial order of dismissal "manifests the Legislature's intention only to grant the court the power to rule on insufficiency, not the power to terminate the proceedings by default"

  5. Wilner v. National Sec. Agency

    592 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 193 times
    Holding that similarly worded provision related to the National Security Agency falls under Exemption 3

  6. Data Tree v. Romaine

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9906 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 179 times
    In Data Tree, a commercial enterprise requested that the Suffolk County Clerk provide it with certain real property records in electronic form.

  7. Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency

    546 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 333 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding CIA refusal to confirm or deny existence of records of CIA connection to activities of ship named the Hughes Glomar Explorer

  8. Matter of Fink v. Lefkowitz

    47 N.Y.2d 567 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 300 times
    Noting that FOIL "established a general policy [in favor of] disclosure"

  9. Minier v. Central Intelligence Agency

    88 F.3d 796 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 172 times
    Holding the "near-blanket" FOIA exemption to protect sources and methods "authorizes the CIA's refusal to confirm or deny the existence of an employment relationship between itself and [an individual]."

  10. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Nat'l Insts. of Health

    745 F.3d 535 (D.C. Cir. 2014)   Cited 82 times
    Finding that when acknowledging the existence of documents would confirm an investigation into an individual, such confirmation is exactly the kind of privacy interest Exemption 7(C) is designed to protect

  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,171 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party