Gould v. New York City Police Department
89 N.Y.2d 267 (N.Y. 1996) Cited 406 timesIn Matter of Gould v. New York City Police Dept. (89 N.Y.2d 267, 274-275), the Court of Appeals noted that "[a]ll government records are * * * presumptively open for public inspection and copying" under FOIL "unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law § 87(2)".
Fitzgibbon v. C.I.A
911 F.2d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1990) Cited 391 timesHolding that, after Sims, domestic intelligence sources are protected to the same extent as foreign sources
Wilner v. National Sec. Agency
592 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2009) Cited 193 timesHolding that similarly worded provision related to the National Security Agency falls under Exemption 3
Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency
546 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1976) Cited 333 times 1 Legal AnalysesUpholding CIA refusal to confirm or deny existence of records of CIA connection to activities of ship named the Hughes Glomar Explorer
In re Rattley v. New York City Police Department
96 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. 2001) Cited 151 timesIn Rattley v. N.Y. City Police Dep't, 96 N.Y.2d 873 (2001), the Court of Appeals reversed the First Department and held that a general certification by the NYPD that a diligent search had been conducted with negative results was sufficient evidence to establish compliance with FOIL. Again, while given an opportunity to challenge the search that was conducted, Mr. Waters has declined to do so.
People v. Taylor
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7911 (N.Y. 2007) Cited 80 timesDescribing defendant's murder of five employees of fast-food restaurant in course of robbery
Hanig v. State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles
79 N.Y.2d 106 (N.Y. 1992) Cited 107 timesHolding that the exemption encompasses information "that would ordinarily and reasonably be regarded as intimate, private information," in this case an employee's medical history
Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District
(N.Y. May. 12, 1998) Cited 75 timesIn Majewski the New York Court of Appeals observed that "the date that legislation is to take effect is a separate question from whether the statute should apply to claims and rights then in existence."
Matter of Fappiano v. New York City Police Department
95 N.Y.2d 738 (N.Y. 2001) Cited 67 timesArgued February 7, 2001. Decided March 27, 2001. APPEAL, in the first above-entitled proceeding, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, from an order of that court, entered December 21, 1999, which affirmed an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered in New York County in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, granting a petition to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's
Defense v.
125 A.D.3d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015) Cited 36 times02-24-2015 In re ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, et al., Petitioners–Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents–Respondents. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York (Gregory Silbert of counsel), for appellants. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondents. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York (Gregory Silbert of counsel), for appellants. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman
Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings
5 U.S.C. § 552 Cited 12,171 times 556 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party