9 Cited authorities

  1. Rakestraw v. California Physicians' Service

    81 Cal.App.4th 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 484 times
    Requiring party to "clearly and specifically set forth the ‘applicable substantive law’ and the legal basis for amendment, i.e., the elements of the cause of action and authority for it," and all specific factual allegations for the claim
  2. Ludgate Insurance Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    82 Cal.App.4th 592 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 111 times
    Finding that where “the bond requirement of section 1616 does not...apply, section 1620, subdivision (b), nonetheless gives the trial court discretion to require the nonadmitted alien insurer to put up such a bond”
  3. Otworth v. Southern Pac. Transportation Co.

    166 Cal.App.3d 452 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 166 times
    In Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co., 166 Cal.App.3d 452, 167 Cal.App.3d 102E, 212 Cal.Rptr. 743, 744-45 (1985), the plaintiff alleged conversion, breach of contract, violations of constitutional rights, and unjust enrichment against his employer for withholding federal and state income tax.
  4. Zumbrun v. University of Southern California

    25 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1972)   Cited 135 times
    Finding the mere placing of trust in another person does not create a fiduciary relationship.
  5. Kramer v. Intuit Inc.

    121 Cal.App.4th 574 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 28 times
    In Kramer v. Intuit, Inc. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 574 [ 18 Cal.Rptr.3d 412], Division Two of our court held that this statutory language means what it says, and that there is nothing unlawful about a rebate offer conditioned on events that can occur before or at the same time as the transaction, notwithstanding that the event could also occur after the transaction is completed.
  6. Melikian v. Truck Ins. Exchange

    133 Cal.App.2d 113 (Cal. Ct. App. 1955)   Cited 16 times

    Docket No. 16300. May 18, 1955. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Edwin J. Owens, Judge. Affirmed. Johnson, Thorne, Speed Bamford, John E. Thorne and Harry V. Bamford for Appellant. Campbell, Custer, Warburton Britton and Walter E. Rankin for Respondents. NOURSE, P.J. Plaintiff sued to enforce an offer of settlement for injuries incurred in a motor vehicle accident. A demurrer to his amended complaint was sustained after argument by counsel for defendants, the plaintiff

  7. Feldesman v. McGovern

    44 Cal.App.2d 566 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)   Cited 23 times
    In Feldesman v. McGovern (1941) 44 Cal.App.2d 566, the plaintiff sued his attorney for failure to file a petition for discharge in bankruptcy.
  8. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  9. Section 430.10 - Grounds for objection by party against whom complaint or cross-complaint filed

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10   Cited 1,043 times
    Explaining "[t]he party against whom a complaint ... has been filed may object, by demurrer ..., to the pleading" on the basis that "[t]he pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"