Fukuda v. City of Angels
20 Cal.4th 805 (Cal. 1999) Cited 482 timesIn Fukuda v. City of Angels (1999) 20 Cal.4th 805, our Supreme Court explained that in the "weight of the evidence" test applicable under "independent judgment review," there is "a strong presumption of correctness concerning the administrative findings" which "provides the trial court with a starting point for review-but it is only a presumption, and may be overcome.
Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. Cty of Los Angeles
11 Cal.3d 506 (Cal. 1974) Cited 469 times 4 Legal AnalysesConstruing requirements of Gov. Code, § 65906 for zoning variances
Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach
48 Cal.App.4th 1152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996) Cited 147 timesFinding City "violated state law by failing to provide a fair hearing . . . [but] did not offend the federal Constitution, on either procedural or substantive due process grounds"
Cassidy v. California Board of Accountancy
220 Cal.App.4th 620 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) Cited 87 timesG046663 2014-01-21 Carl Randolf CASSIDY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, Defendant and Respondent. See 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Extraordinary Writs, § 273 et seq. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Andrew P. Banks, Judge. Affirmed. (Super. Ct. No. 30–2011–00466661) IKOLA See 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Extraordinary Writs, § 273 et seq. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Andrew P. Banks
Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.
5 Cal.App.5th 1055 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 75 timesFinding no fundamental vested right affected by college discipline of a student
Morrison v. State Board of Education
1 Cal.3d 214 (Cal. 1969) Cited 267 timesHolding that the Board of Education could not characterize the petitioner's conduct as immoral or unprofessional and revoke his teaching certificate unless the conduct indicated he was unfit to teach
Board of Education v. Jack M.
19 Cal.3d 691 (Cal. 1977) Cited 108 timesIn Jack M., we held that since a fitness hearing is guaranteed to convicted persons by statute, the denial of such a hearing to an unconvicted person would violate equal protection.
San Diego Unified Sch. v. Commn On Profl
194 Cal.App.4th 1454 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 35 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. D057740. April 4, 2011. Appeal from the Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 37-2009-00093780-CU-WM-CTL, Steven R. Denton, Judge. Jose A. Gonzales and Mark Bresee for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. Tosdal, Smith, Steiner Wax and Fern Steiner for Real Party in Interest and Respondent. OPINION NARES, Acting P. J. Frank Lampedusa, a tenured teacher with the San Diego Unified School District (District) and the real party in interest in the matter, appealed
Landau v. Superior Court
81 Cal.App.4th 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 40 timesNos. A075493 A075251 Filed January 12, 1998 Opinion Certified for Partial Publication Review granted April 15, 1998. Review was dismissed on June 14, 2000, and the opinion was directed to be partially published. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b)and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts III, IV and VI. Appeal from San Francisco Superior Court, No. 976845, Honorable William Cahill, Judge. Tanke Willemsen, Tony J. Tanke and Gary L. Simms, for
Pinheiro v. Civil Serv. Comm'n for the Cnty. of Fresno
245 Cal.App.4th 1458 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 15 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Pinheiro v. Civil Service Com. for County of Fresno (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 1458 (Pinheiro), we concluded Pinheiro was denied a fair hearing before the Commission because the Commission relied on extra-record evidence when it upheld his dismissal.