People v. Sarpas
225 Cal.App.4th 1539 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 70 timesHolding that "[l]iability under the UCL may be imposed against those who aid and abet the violation"
Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court
56 Cal.2d 355 (Cal. 1961) Cited 294 times 3 Legal AnalysesIn Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.
Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.
198 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 30 timesNoting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act
W. Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior Court
56 Cal.2d 407 (Cal. 1961) Cited 67 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn West Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 407, 415 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 119, 364 P.2d 295], this court, quoting Ryan v. Superior Court (1961) 186 Cal.App.2d 813, 816-817 [ 9 Cal.Rptr. 147], declared: "One of the prime purposes of the Discovery Act is to expedite the trial of the action.
Section 2025.420 - Motion for protective order
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.420 Cited 64 times 2 Legal AnalysesAuthorizing any "affected" person to move for protective order before, during, or after deposition