§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Penny Mintz,, Appellant,v.The Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondent, Rachel Lavine, Intervenor-Respondent.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. Parochial v. Board of Educ

    60 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 824 times
    Holding that § 3813's notice of claim requirement "is not satisfied by presentment to any other individual or body"

  2. Matter of Hutson v. Bass

    54 N.Y.2d 772 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 98 times
    Finding that "the undisputed fact that the cover sheets for the designating petitions of candidates for election as judicial delegates were not filed within the time prescribed by the statute, although late by only 15 minutes, was a fatal defect"

  3. Niebauer v. Board of Elections

    76 A.D.3d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 13 times

    No. 2010-07884. August 18, 2010. In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate petitions (a) designating Michael N. Niebauer and Pamela J. Rinando as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 14, 2010, for the Independence Party positions of Male Member and Female Member, respectively, of the Independence Party State Committee from the 27th Assembly District, and Delegates to the Eleventh Judicial District Convention from the 27th Assembly District, (b)

  4. Matter of Goodman v. Hayduk

    45 N.Y.2d 804 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 39 times

    Argued August 30, 1978 Decided September 1, 1978 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE D. BURCHELL, J., LEONARD RUBENFELD, J. Thomas J. Abinanti for appellants. Lawrence A. Mandelker for Raymond McNamara, respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. This special proceeding instituted pursuant to article 16 of the Election Law was brought on by service of an order to show cause accompanied

  5. Matter of Bosco v. Smith

    104 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 6 times

    August 22, 1984 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Slifkin, J.). Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application granted and the Board of Elections is directed to remove the names of F. Wilson Smith and Imogene R. Mayer from the appropriate ballot. Petitioner seeks to invalidate the instant designating petitions for failure to comply with subdivision 4 of section 2-102 Elec. of the Election Law. That section states that whenever a political party establishes

  6. Matter of Bosco v. Smith

    63 N.Y.2d 698 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    Argued August 27, 1984 Decided August 28, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Morrie Slifkin, J. Thomas J. Spargo and David N. Liebman for appellants. Ilan S. Schoenberger, County Attorney ( Martin Hurwitz of counsel), for Rockland County Board of Elections, respondent. Joel J. Flick and Paul V. Nowicki for Philip J. Bosco, respondent. Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 104 A.D

  7. Matter of Roman v. Sharpe, Sachs

    42 N.Y.2d 986 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 5 times

    Argued August 30, 1977 Decided August 31, 1977 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, RUBIN, J. Lawrence A. Mandelker for appellant. Peter Lubell and Raymond F. Narral for petitioners-respondents. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. Two issues are tendered. We agree with the referee and both courts below that the petitions should not be invalidated on the ground that the words "new voter" were inserted

  8. Matter of Quinones v. Bass

    45 N.Y.2d 811 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 4 times

    Argued August 30, 1978 Decided September 1, 1978 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH DI FEDE, J. Paul A. Victor, David N. Raucher, Stanley K. Schlein and Frank Vozza for Peter M. Rivera and others, appellants-respondents. Demostenes Santiago Roque for Jose A. Quinones and others, respondents-appellants. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed in all respects, without costs. On the appeal by petitioners in the

  9. Matter of Goldblum v. Power

    153 N.E.2d 390 (N.Y. 1958)   Cited 1 times

    Argued August 7, 1958 Decided August 7, 1958 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, SAMUEL RABIN, J. A. Paul Goldblum, appellant-respondent in person. Benj. J. Jacobson and Charles Margett for respondents-appellants. Order of the Appellate Division modified, insofar as it holds the designating petitions void in part for failure to designate candidates for County Committeemen separately by sexes, and as to that question order reversed and proceeding