§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant-Respondent,v.Stanley R. Kims, II, Respondent-Appellant.

Brief

73 Cited authorities

  1. Samson v. California

    547 U.S. 843 (2006)   Cited 1,346 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction

  2. Maryland v. Buie

    494 U.S. 325 (1990)   Cited 2,355 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, incident to arrest, an officer may conduct a limited protective sweep of those areas of a house in which he reasonably suspects a dangerous person may be hiding

  3. Ryburn v. Huff

    565 U.S. 469 (2012)   Cited 223 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a “reasonable policeofficer could read” Brigham City and related decisions “to mean that the Fourth Amendment permits an officer to enter a residence if the officer has a reasonable basis for concluding that there is an imminent threat of violence,” and noting that the officers in Ryburn “could have come to the conclusion that there was an imminent threat to their safety and the safety of others.”

  4. People v. Alvino

    71 N.Y.2d 233 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 1,070 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence of similar uncharged crimes is excluded for policy reasons because it may induce the jury to base a finding of guilt on collateral matters

  5. People v. Ventimiglia

    52 N.Y.2d 350 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 1,264 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government is required to obtain advance judicial approval for the admission of other crimes/bad acts evidence

  6. Bollenbach v. United States

    326 U.S. 607 (1946)   Cited 752 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an incorrect jury instruction is not cured by an earlier, correct instruction

  7. Calley v. Hoffman

    425 U.S. 911 (1976)   Cited 243 times
    Holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. § 485h(c), applied to sales of thermally generated electrical power

  8. People v. Concepcion

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5110 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 225 times
    Noting that New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 470.15 bars the Appellate Division "from affirming a judgment, sentence or order on a ground not decided adversely to the appellant by the trial court"

  9. People v. Hudy

    73 N.Y.2d 40 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v. Hudy, 73 N.Y.2d at 57, the Court of Appeals held that a trial court's preclusion of cross-examination questions regarding an investigating officer's testimony, coupled with the admission of a prior sexual allegation against the defendant, skewed the case in favor of the state and constituted reversible error.

  10. People v. Scarola

    71 N.Y.2d 769 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 302 times
    Holding that "the fact that an exhibition of a physical characteristic is not testimonial in nature does not necessarily require its reception as evidence at trial [t]he test of whether voice exemplar evidence should be admitted as real or demonstrative evidence is not whether the proposed exemplar would be communicative, but whether it is relevant and reliable"